SCOTUS Saves NY-11 Seat
High Court Slaps Down Dems’ “Frankenseat” Staten Island Redraw — For Now
LUTHMANN NOTE: Justice Samuel Alito didn’t hedge. He didn’t duck. He called it what it was — “blatant” and “odious” racial discrimination. That matters. The Equal Protection Clause does not come with a partisan exception. The Constitution is colorblind. It does not allow Albany politicians to redraw congressional maps based on skin color because the polling data looks bad. Kathy Hochul and Marc Elias tried to carve up Staten Island and baptize it as “voting rights.” It was power politics dressed up as civil rights. They gambled that race would shield them from scrutiny. Alito shredded that theory in five paragraphs. Now the National Democratic Redistricting Committee cries federalism while quietly stepping over Hakeem Jeffries’ own statement that the New York Voting Rights Act does not apply to congressional races. So which is it? Either Jeffries was wrong, or the lawsuit was. Democrats can’t have both. Staten Island survived because six justices enforced a simple rule: government cannot sort citizens by race to win elections. That is not radical. That is constitutional. And for once, Albany’s power brokers hit a wall they could not spin away. This piece is “SCOTUS Saves NY-11 Seat,” first available on NYNewsPress.com.
By Richard Luthmann
Supreme Court Blocks NY-11 Redraw, Keeps NYC’s Lone GOP Seat
(Staten Island, N.Y., and Washington, D.C.) – The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a bombshell decision saving Staten Island’s congressional seat from a Democratic-led carve-up. In an unsigned order, the justices sided with Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) and halted a lower court’s plan to redraw New York’s 11th Congressional District. The high court effectively preserved New York City’s only Republican-held district for the 2026 midterm elections, blocking what critics dubbed a “racial gerrymander” aimed at ousting Malliotakis.
The court’s conservative majority (6–3) stepped in despite liberal justices’ furious dissent, arguing the case should have been left to the New York State courts.
Justice Samuel Alito defended the intervention, blasting the attempted redraw as “blatantly” race-based and “an inherently ‘odious’” form of discrimination.
This ruling is a major victory for the GOP in the nationwide redistricting wars. By keeping Staten Island’s district intact, the Supreme Court handed Republicans a crucial boost in their fight to retain control of the closely divided U.S. House.
Every seat counts – the GOP currently holds a razor-thin 218–214 majority in the House. Losing the Staten Island seat would imperil Republicans’ hold on Congress and, with Donald Trump back in the White House, threaten his legislative agenda.
Now, thanks to the Supreme Court’s intervention, Staten Island’s “red” stronghold remains safe for 2026.
Local Republicans rejoiced at the reprieve, calling it a last-minute save for New York City’s lone GOP voice on Capitol Hill. Malliotakis herself is widely seen as the big winner, avoiding a Democratic “map massacre” that could have erased her district.
She will run for re-election on her existing turf – Staten Island and a slice of Brooklyn – rather than a radically altered map. GOP leaders hailed the outcome as proof that even in deep-blue New York City, hardball lawfare has its limits.
SCOTUS Saves NY-11 Seat: Dems’ “Frankenseat” Scheme Exposed and Thwarted
The Supreme Court’s order torpedoes what Republicans had dubbed the Democrats’ “Frankenseat” scheme – a brazen attempt to stitch Staten Island into two grotesquely gerrymandered districts. Last year, a cadre of Democrat lawyers led by Marc Elias – Hillary Clinton’s notorious election lawyer – quietly filed a lawsuit seeking to dismember Staten Island on the pretext of racial equity.
The Elias plan was jaw-dropping: split the borough in half and fuse the pieces onto two Democrat-heavy areas. The North Shore of Staten Island would be grafted onto left-leaning Lower Manhattan, while the South Shore would be lumped into a Brooklyn district dominated by Coney Island housing projects.
In plain terms, the city’s lone Republican enclave was to be sliced up and drowned in a sea of Democrat voters.
“Democrats attempt another gerrymander of NY-11 by linking Staten Island to Manhattan… this is a naked attempt to disenfranchise voters,” state GOP Chairman Ed Cox warned when the lawsuit emerged.
The legal assault hinged on New York’s new voting-rights law and a political hack Manhattan judge to do the dirty work. Justice Jeffrey Pearlman – an appointee and ally of Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul – embraced Elias’s arguments and ordered the extreme redraw in January.
Pearlman ruled that the current Staten Island/Brooklyn district (drawn by a neutral special master in 2022 after Democrats’ last map was struck down) “unconstitutionally dilutes” Black and Hispanic voting power. In his view, only by injecting thousands of new minority voters from other boroughs could NY-11 provide proper “minority influence.”
Republicans blasted that rationale as a flimsy fig leaf for a partisan power grab. Malliotakis’s team argued the proposed fix was really a racially engineered gerrymander designed to flip the seat blue.
Notably, Malliotakis herself is the daughter of a Cuban immigrant and the first Latina ever to represent Staten Island – a fact that laid bare the absurdity of claiming minority “disenfranchisement” under the current lines.
“The fact that they’re claiming Hispanics and minorities are disenfranchised when I’m the first Hispanic elected to represent the district makes it even more ridiculous,” Malliotakis said, ridiculing the lawsuit’s logic.
Her sentiments were echoed borough-wide: the “Frankenseat” map was seen as a naked racial gerrymander dressed up as civil rights. Critics slammed Judge Pearlman as “Hochul’s political hack in a robe,” accusing him of doing Albany’s bidding at Staten Island’s expense.
Republicans Rejoice as Malliotakis Dodges “Map Massacre”
Staten Island Republicans are celebrating a hard-fought win that saved their community from being carved apart. But it never should have gotten this far. Many still wonder why Malliotakis’s Chicago-based lawyers didn’t remove the case to federal court in the very beginning.
Still, Malliotakis lauded the Supreme Court for restoring sanity and stopping an egregious case of judicial overreach. By intervening, the justices “threw out” the racial gerrymander that would have silenced Staten Island’s voice in Congress.
In a forceful concurrence, Justice Samuel Alito warned that New York’s trial court had ordered “blatant” and “odious” racial discrimination, calling it an obvious Equal Protection violation that the Supreme Court could not allow to taint a federal election. Here is some of the language Justice Alito used:
“These cases concern a state-court order that blatantly discriminates on the basis of race.”
“That is unadorned racial discrimination, an inherently ‘odious’ activity that violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause except in the ‘most extraordinary case.’”
“Our precedents have identified only two compelling interests that can justify race-based government action… Neither of those interests is present here.”
“Under the Supremacy Clause, a state law cannot authorize the violation of federal rights.”
“It is therefore an understatement to say that applicants are likely to succeed on the merits of their equal protection claim.”
“That would provide a way of achieving what a full review would not permit: the use of an unconstitutional district in the November election… That is a prospect this Court should not countenance.”
Malliotakis had previously warned that the Manhattan court’s decision “threw New York’s elections into chaos” and would have produced an illegal, race-driven district[15]. Now, with the high court on her side, she is breathing easier.
We reached out to Malliotakis’s team for fresh comment on the ruling. No response was received as of press time.
“This lawsuit was never about voting rights – it was about redrawing lines to exclude Republicans. Kathy Hochul admitted as much,” said one jubilant Staten Island GOP strategist.
National Republican leaders also praised the ruling, noting that keeping Malliotakis’s seat improves their odds of holding the House in 2026. With New York’s 11th remaining a compact Staten Island-centered district, the electoral math strongly favors the GOP – a relief for a party clinging to a slim majority.
“Make no mistake, if the Democrats’ map had gone through, they would have stolen this seat outright. Democrats sure know how to steal elections,” a Trump insider said off-the-record, crediting Malliotakis for fighting back.
Democrats, for their part, reacted with dismay – and a hint of rage. The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices issued a blistering dissent, accusing the conservative majority of meddling in state affairs. Here are some highlights:
“The Court’s 101-word unexplained order can be summarized in just 7: ‘Rules for thee, but not for me.’”
“Ignoring every limit on federal courts’ authority, the Court takes the unprecedented step of staying a state trial court’s decision… without giving the State’s highest court a chance to act.”
“Here, there is no final decision from any state court, let alone New York’s highest court, on any federal question.”
“Four months before an election may be too late for a lower federal court to act, but it is not too late for this Court to upend a State’s administration of its own election laws.”
“If this Court’s grasping reach extends even to a nonfinal decision of a state trial court, then every decision from any court is now fair game.”
“If you build it, they will come.”
Voting-rights advocates who backed the suit decried the ruling as a setback for minority representation, arguing that Staten Island’s current map still isn’t “fair” to Black and Latino voters. But their outrage rang hollow to locals. Prominent Staten Island community leaders insist race was just a smokescreen.
“Marc Elias, a Lowlife America hater, tried to use race as a cover story. At the end of the day, it was never about black, brown, or white — it was all about green, the color of money and raw political power,” said John Tabacco, a Staten Island civic activist, blasting the plaintiffs’ racial justification as a cynical ploy.
Such sentiments now prevail across Staten Island. After months of anxiety, residents are exhaling: their island remains whole, their vote undiluted. Malliotakis is favored to win again in 2026, keeping this ruby-red district firmly in GOP hands.
SCOTUS Saves NY-11 Seat: National Dems Ignore Reality While Local Editor Finds Ways to Blame Trump
The National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) responded to the decision with outrage. Founded and chaired by former Attorney General Eric Holder at the end of the Obama Administration, the NDRC framed the ruling not as a constitutional check on race-based redistricting, but as partisan interference designed to protect Republicans in a closely divided U.S. House.
Marina Jenkins, the group’s executive director, argued that New York courts should have been allowed to finish their review without what she labeled “meddling by activist justices.” Here is the NDRC statement:
“The Supreme Court’s decision to intervene in an active state court proceeding is an extraordinary and unprecedented breach of the principles that have long governed our federal system. By short-circuiting New York’s judicial process before it has even run its course, the Court has placed a thumb on the scale in favor of the partisan interest of the Republican Party. The people of New York deserve to have the ability to seek justice in their state court free from meddling by activist justices on the Supreme Court.”
We asked the NDRC’s communications director, Madia Coleman, some basic questions about certain inconsistencies with the Obama/Holder position in light of the SCOTUS ruling. As of press time, we have not heard back. Here is what we asked:
From: Richard Luthmann <richard.luthmann@protonmail.com>
Date: On Monday, March 2nd, 2026 at 9:47 PM
Subject: Press Inquiry – Jeffries’ NY VRA Position & “Colorblind Constitution” – Stay in NY-11 Redistricting Case
To: Madia Coleman <comms@democraticredistricting.com>
CC: Dick LaFontaine <RALafontaine@protonmail.com>, Rick LaRivière <RickLaRiviere@proton.me>, Modern Thomas Nast <mthomasnast@protonmail.com>, Frank Parlato <frankparlato@gmail.com>, Michael Volpe <mvolpe998@gmail.com>, Frankie Pressman <frankiepressman@protonmail.com>, richard@nynewspress.com <richard@nynewspress.com>, jt@liquidlunchtv.com <jt@liquidlunchtv.com>, Cara Castronuova <caracastronuova@yahoo.com>, Jim Hoft <jimhoft@gmail.com>Dear Madia,
Richard Luthmann here, NYNewsPress.com.
Thank you for the NDRC statement on Malliotakis v. Williams. I’m preparing follow-up coverage and need clarification on two specific points.
1. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries’ Prior Position on the NYS Voting Rights Act
On August 20, 2025, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries publicly stated that the New York State Voting Rights Act did not apply to congressional races. His remarks were widely interpreted as rejecting the use of the NYS VRA to redraw federal congressional districts.
https://jeffries.house.gov/2025/08/20/leader-jeffries-ny-house-dems-the-republican-effort-to-disenfranchise-millions-of-new-yorkers-cannot-go-unanswered/
Given that the current litigation relied heavily on the NYS VRA as the basis for altering NY-11, does the NDRC believe Leader Jeffries was wrong?
If not, how does the NDRC reconcile its support for this lawsuit with Jeffries’ prior position that the NYS VRA does not govern congressional maps?
2. Does the NDRC Support a “Colorblind Constitution”?
Justice Alito’s order emphasized that racial classifications in redistricting are “odious” and subject to strict scrutiny.
Does the NDRC believe the U.S. Constitution is colorblind — meaning government may not draw districts primarily based on race — or does it believe race-conscious redistricting is constitutionally permissible in this context?
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Regards,
Richard Luthmann
Writer, Journalist, and Commentator
Tips or Story Ideas:
(239) 631-5957
richard.luthmann@protonmail.com
LINKTREE
Muck Rack Profile
Substack: This is For Real.
Editor-In-Chief: FLGulf.news
Editor-In-Chief: NYNewsPress.com
Editor-In-Chief: TheFamilyCourtCircus.com
Contributor: Frank Report
Contributor: Sun Bay Paper
Follow Me on Facebook X Instagram LinkedIn TRUTH Rumble Newsbreak SPOTIFY
If we hear anything further from the NDRC, particularly why the Obama/Holder group threw Hakeem Jeffries under the bus, we will put out a follow-up.
Now, all that’s left is for Staten Island’s paper of record to put a surreal spin on this saga.
Even as courts and politicians warred over NY-11, Staten Island Advance editor Brian Laline trained his sights on an unsurprising target: Donald J. Trump. Last month, Laline penned a head-scratching column that essentially exonerated Democratic map-makers and pinned the blame on Trump for the redistricting chaos.
In his telling, Democrats were forced to gerrymander Staten Island’s district only because Trump had “started this mess” by encouraging Republicans in states like Texas to shore up their own maps. It’s a classic case of political DARVO – Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender – and local observers aren’t buying it. Laline flipped the script, casting Staten Islanders as villains for electing Republicans and casting Democrats as saviors “forced” into racial gerrymandering.
In reality, of course, it was Kathy Hochul, Albany Democrats and their D.C. legal hitman Marc Elias, who concocted the “Frankenseat” plot from the start. All Trump did was cheer his party on – it was Governor Hochul & Co. who decided to “fight fire with fire” and rip up the rulebook in New York.
Laline’s Trump-derangement spin has drawn open ridicule, including from this outlet.
Sorry, Brian, that spin won’t fly. Trump isn’t the one slicing up Staten Island’s district – your pals in the Democratic machine are. Blaming Trump is just a lazy dodge from the ugly truth that the Democrat Party is rigging the game at voters’ expense.”
Indeed, the facts are hard to deny: New York Democrats already tried an illegal gerrymander in 2022 and got smacked down by the courts. This year they tried again under a phony civil-rights pretext – and nearly succeeded in stealing NY-11 by any means necessary.
The reality is that Staten Islanders aren’t about to let a partisan media narrative obscure what really happened. The United States Supreme Court pulled NY-11 back from the brink of a political heist, and no amount of finger-pointing at Mar-a-Lago will change that.
As the dust settles, Malliotakis’s district stays Republican red, the Staten Island community stays intact, and the only thing left in tatters is the local liberal spin.
The next time Democrats attempt a power grab on Staten Island, they might find that blaming Trump won’t save them – and neither will their “Frankenseat” monstrosity.
Laline’s column is out Wednesday. We’ll see what he has to say — or whether he whistles past the graveyard on this one.
FU Barrack Obama and Eric Holder!! U 2 R the one's that tucked up New York in the 1st place!!! FU ALL!!