This ruling is long overdue. The idea that a parent could lose custody or even basic visitation just for speaking about their own lived experience is terrifying. Family court is already opaque and incredibly hard to navigate, especially for mothers. Silencing someone with a nondisparagement order and then punishing them for telling the truth about their case doesn’t protect children it protects a broken system. No one should have their child taken from them just for using their voice. Thank you for shedding light on this issue.
I literally can’t get my head wrapped around hurting innocent precious children . Their no reason in world for parent or anyone hit
A child . If your 1 thinks it’s ok ? Look in face of innocence that didn’t do nothing wrong?? I had 3 Children, Adults now , Not 1 X did ever touch my children. They learned everything from me even cooking they were breezeo raise
I proud honored to have raised 3 Amazing Children.🍀🙏🏼❤️🥰
bringing light to the invisible injuries of trauma and posttraumatic stress. Brain scans like the SPECT scans analyzed by Dr. Hipskind are finally revealing what can’t be seen from the outside. Someone may appear composed, but inside, they’re carrying deep wounds from repeated trauma and betrayal. They might not sleep, they live in a state of hypervigilance, and yet it’s often dismissed because “they look fine.” The truth is, trauma doesn’t always leave visible scars it lives in the brain, and we need tools like these scans to validate and understand that reality.
I can assuredly say that I have never been paid a dime by the Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts. They are an excellent organization, and you have a personal problem with their Executive Director. Why don't you state for the record - since we're talking truth - what happened (from your bias / perspective)?
As for Dr. Hipskind, his credentials speak for themselves.
And Blessing, dear, when I say something, you can TAKE IT TO THE BANK. Believe me!
You have no crediblity Mr. Luthman. None. Your "assurance' literally means nothing. VOID.
I didn't think you'd be able to produce that information.
Doesn't exist. Fake entity, fake council
Did you vet out his credentials, Richard? You believe everything you see? Read?
Can you set up a Zoom meeting/podcast with him?
Then he can direct us to where this WH Counsel for Brain Heath is? (be wary though, it may suddenly appear on the internet now!) Ever use the WayBack Machine to capture websites before people alter them/take them down? Try it, it's fun!
I see the patterns of fabrications. I want you to prove me wrong. I was deeply desiring that you had the data!
I believe you have failed in your duties as a journalist Mr. Luthmann - you reported on something that doesn't seem to exist, making biased, potentially dangerous claims about people who work with children, endangering them.
Parroting claims without independently verifying, this "excellent" organization's claims and vetting out the information, seems like collusion. Continuing to defend an objectively indefensible postion could amount to being complicit can't it? You were an attorney, is that assesment accurate?
What REPUTABLE "excellent" organization threatens customers and hires a felon to write up stories on them? HOW is that reputable?
Can't they get reputable outlets? Why we scrounging round the botton of the barrel here?
HOW are you reputable or credible at all?:
"respondent is a clear danger to the public."
"record lacked any indication respondent’s addiction and psychiatric disorder played any role in his criminal conduct, which demonstrates a *****moral
disconnect of great proportion*****.
"bipolar...crimes were absurd, bizarre, and ruthless. The case illustrates the danger in ignoring mental health problems...Luthmann’s crimes were bizarre and ruthless...failing to disclose material facts...to perpetuate the fraud...commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer..used his professional position to carry out the crime"
"demonstrated a distaste for, or refusal to lead, a law-abiding life. Even after his release on bail, respondent engaged in criminal conduct"
"a total lack of moral fiber must be disbarred in order to protect the public...fraudulent scheme was so serious that it had the potential of damaging international business relations between the United States and China."
"Court has recognized, “[s]ome criminal conduct is so utterly
incompatible with the standard of honesty and integrity... Such is the case
Any REPUTABLE entity would disassociate very, very far from you. I believe in healing and second chances, your bevhor says you are still stuck in your "total lack of moral fiber and utterly incompatible with the standard of honesty and integrity"
The fact you can't BACK this WH entity is further proof of your lack of crediblility. You have a precious opportunity to set the record straight, build credibilty, transparency and dignity and correct me if I was wrong or missed something.-- and you took the low road in accordance with your past.
BTW - even in poverty, I wouldn't take a damn penny from you.
Blessing, I’m done wasting my time with you. I’m banning you for 30 days.
I get banned all the time for being intolerable with the truth. I’m banned right now from YouTube and Facebook groups. I survive, so you’ll survive.
You can do two things.
1) Go talk about whatever you want on all the other public outlets available.
2) Go make your own outlet.
I’m committed to free speech, and I’m leaving everything you’ve said up. But you are an intolerable distraction from reality.
In 30 days, when your ban is up, you can decide to post again here. Or not. I really don’t care either way.
Maybe you’ll learn how to behave. Or if the issue is mental illness, then maybe you’ll get help.*
*If you get me a doctor’s note that your rantings are the product of something you are currently addressing in treatment, I will lift your ban immediately.
This ruling is long overdue. The idea that a parent could lose custody or even basic visitation just for speaking about their own lived experience is terrifying. Family court is already opaque and incredibly hard to navigate, especially for mothers. Silencing someone with a nondisparagement order and then punishing them for telling the truth about their case doesn’t protect children it protects a broken system. No one should have their child taken from them just for using their voice. Thank you for shedding light on this issue.
I literally can’t get my head wrapped around hurting innocent precious children . Their no reason in world for parent or anyone hit
A child . If your 1 thinks it’s ok ? Look in face of innocence that didn’t do nothing wrong?? I had 3 Children, Adults now , Not 1 X did ever touch my children. They learned everything from me even cooking they were breezeo raise
I proud honored to have raised 3 Amazing Children.🍀🙏🏼❤️🥰
This is such an important direction
bringing light to the invisible injuries of trauma and posttraumatic stress. Brain scans like the SPECT scans analyzed by Dr. Hipskind are finally revealing what can’t be seen from the outside. Someone may appear composed, but inside, they’re carrying deep wounds from repeated trauma and betrayal. They might not sleep, they live in a state of hypervigilance, and yet it’s often dismissed because “they look fine.” The truth is, trauma doesn’t always leave visible scars it lives in the brain, and we need tools like these scans to validate and understand that reality.
Research him. Mostly dead ends.
Which is why Dr. Hipskind is on the White House Council for Brain Health and works with HHS Secretary RFK Jr.
You are purveying what George Carlin termed as "STUNNING BULLSHIT."
The only question now is who is paying you: George Soros, the DNC, or both?
I can assuredly say that I have never been paid a dime by the Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts. They are an excellent organization, and you have a personal problem with their Executive Director. Why don't you state for the record - since we're talking truth - what happened (from your bias / perspective)?
As for Dr. Hipskind, his credentials speak for themselves.
And Blessing, dear, when I say something, you can TAKE IT TO THE BANK. Believe me!
You have no crediblity Mr. Luthman. None. Your "assurance' literally means nothing. VOID.
I didn't think you'd be able to produce that information.
Doesn't exist. Fake entity, fake council
Did you vet out his credentials, Richard? You believe everything you see? Read?
Can you set up a Zoom meeting/podcast with him?
Then he can direct us to where this WH Counsel for Brain Heath is? (be wary though, it may suddenly appear on the internet now!) Ever use the WayBack Machine to capture websites before people alter them/take them down? Try it, it's fun!
I see the patterns of fabrications. I want you to prove me wrong. I was deeply desiring that you had the data!
I believe you have failed in your duties as a journalist Mr. Luthmann - you reported on something that doesn't seem to exist, making biased, potentially dangerous claims about people who work with children, endangering them.
Parroting claims without independently verifying, this "excellent" organization's claims and vetting out the information, seems like collusion. Continuing to defend an objectively indefensible postion could amount to being complicit can't it? You were an attorney, is that assesment accurate?
What REPUTABLE "excellent" organization threatens customers and hires a felon to write up stories on them? HOW is that reputable?
Can't they get reputable outlets? Why we scrounging round the botton of the barrel here?
HOW are you reputable or credible at all?:
"respondent is a clear danger to the public."
"record lacked any indication respondent’s addiction and psychiatric disorder played any role in his criminal conduct, which demonstrates a *****moral
disconnect of great proportion*****.
"bipolar...crimes were absurd, bizarre, and ruthless. The case illustrates the danger in ignoring mental health problems...Luthmann’s crimes were bizarre and ruthless...failing to disclose material facts...to perpetuate the fraud...commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer..used his professional position to carry out the crime"
"demonstrated a distaste for, or refusal to lead, a law-abiding life. Even after his release on bail, respondent engaged in criminal conduct"
"a total lack of moral fiber must be disbarred in order to protect the public...fraudulent scheme was so serious that it had the potential of damaging international business relations between the United States and China."
"Court has recognized, “[s]ome criminal conduct is so utterly
incompatible with the standard of honesty and integrity... Such is the case
here."
file:///E:/Foundation%20for%20Child%20Victims%20of%20the%20Family%20Courts%20FCVFC/Luthmann/SUPREME%20COURT%20OF%20NEW%20JERSEY%20Luthmann%20felon.pdf
Any REPUTABLE entity would disassociate very, very far from you. I believe in healing and second chances, your bevhor says you are still stuck in your "total lack of moral fiber and utterly incompatible with the standard of honesty and integrity"
The fact you can't BACK this WH entity is further proof of your lack of crediblility. You have a precious opportunity to set the record straight, build credibilty, transparency and dignity and correct me if I was wrong or missed something.-- and you took the low road in accordance with your past.
BTW - even in poverty, I wouldn't take a damn penny from you.
Blessing, I’m done wasting my time with you. I’m banning you for 30 days.
I get banned all the time for being intolerable with the truth. I’m banned right now from YouTube and Facebook groups. I survive, so you’ll survive.
You can do two things.
1) Go talk about whatever you want on all the other public outlets available.
2) Go make your own outlet.
I’m committed to free speech, and I’m leaving everything you’ve said up. But you are an intolerable distraction from reality.
In 30 days, when your ban is up, you can decide to post again here. Or not. I really don’t care either way.
Maybe you’ll learn how to behave. Or if the issue is mental illness, then maybe you’ll get help.*
*If you get me a doctor’s note that your rantings are the product of something you are currently addressing in treatment, I will lift your ban immediately.