Connecticut Court "Cash For Kids" Scheme Services Pedophiles?
DEAL WITH THE DEVIL EXPOSED: Connecticut Courts Sell Children To Pedophiles, Luthmann Opines
NOTE: August 13, 2024
I originally published this piece one year ago. Not much has really changed in Connecticut CA$H FOR KID$.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/child-molester-and-psychopath
Albino Pedophile Christopher Ambrose, the legally-protected Former DNC/Clinton Lawyer, and disgraced Hollywood plagiarist, still deserves to be delivered to Hell, hopefully by the quickest means available under the laws of God and man. We all know that Natural Law is dead in Connecticut, killed by the leftists and the statists. And along with the death of God in government and the courts comes the death of Truth and the Treason of Legal Fiction, a crime against God and man. This is a theme I will be picking up on.
It's a shame Judge Thomas J. O'Neill continues to have the wool pulled over his eyes by Ambrose. I can't believe a Catholic Stonehill College graduate ran with Ambrose's "Open Adoption" denials in the face of clear proof to the contrary. Tara Southern, the child's birth mother, has gone on record that the adopted Ambrose child may not have been carried to term if there was no Open Adoption alternative.
The Catholic Church supports Open Adoption because it gives birth mothers a chance to Choose Life and Hope; that their children will have a loving home that they cannot then provide. And one day, if they can get their lives in order, the birth mother can have a relationship with the child, supported by the adoptive parents and the Glory of God.
https://www.focusonthefamily.com/pro-life/the-adoption-family-our-open-adoption-story/
Ambrose lied to Judge O'Neill that there was a "Closed Adoption." This is not true. O'Neill has never corrected this error in the record, even after it has been pointed out. It's akin to Judge O'Neill judicially sanctioning abortion. That activity is excommunicable under Church Canon Law. Can. 1397 § 2. At the very least, O'Neill should have a frank conversation with Bridgeport Bishop Frank Caggiano - before O'Neill goes the way of Nancy Pelosi.
Ambrose is probably already too far gone. But I pray for his soul. As a Fourth Degree Knight of Columbus, I trust in God's Plan above all.
The latest CT courts rumor I have heard—and I'll be clear that it is an uncorroborated rumor from someone with inside knowledge—is that Jane Kupson Grossman will be administratively re-assigned on September 1. This is still a rumor, and until I can obtain additional confirmation, I will label it as such. If you have any information on this or any other issues, contact me.
I will be sitting down with fellow journalist Michael Volpe tomorrow for a Family Court update podcast. Paul Boyne will be a topic of conversation.
So will Chicago's crooked Beermann LLP family law firm.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/the-children-are-coming-chicago-family
Also, we will discuss my personal encounter with a Domestic Violence abuser in Charlotte County, FL.
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/tough-guy-journalist-gets-tougher
Stay tuned. Email any questions beforehand, and I'll try to get to them.
NOTE: A Go Fund Me Page has been established to help Karen Riordan and her three children, Mia, Matthew, and Sawyer, reunite and achieve justice. If it is within your means, please help this family.
DONATE HERE
Karen Riordan has complete discretion over the use of these funds, which will be used to:
Support the family in covering financial needs like food, clothing, and back-to-school.
Hire experienced legal counsel to present a compelling case in court.
Engage qualified experts to evaluate the children’s well-being and provide unbiased assessments.
Highlight the evidence of abuse and its profound impact on the children’s mental and emotional health.
Advocate for the children’s voices to be heard and considered in court proceedings.
Promote regional and national awareness of this case so that abusers are not empowered by twisting Jennifer’s Law and similar legislation to protect domestic violence victims.
You can DONATE HERE. Regardless of size, every donation will significantly impact this family’s future. Your support can help reunite Mia, Matthew, and Sawyer with their mother, allowing them to heal and rebuild their lives.
DONATE HERE
This is a work of opinion and commentary. Readers are asked to draw their own conclusions. Please also visit the Frank Report for continuing coverage of the Ambrose case.
By Richard Luthmann
On August 8, Connecticut Judge Thomas J. “Steal” O’Neill, a former corporate litigation partner at Day Pitney LLP, granted disgraced Hollywood writer Christopher Ambrose’s petition for Restraining Orders in Bridgeport Family Court.
Ambrose’s ex-wife Karen Riordan is now barred from seeing her children, Mia, 16, Matthew, 16, and Sawyer, 13, for one year. The children, who were residing with her, are now homeless. They have fled to out-of-state relatives for temporary refuge.
“Our court system works best when it reflects the diversity, experience, and understanding of the people it serves,” Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont said in a press release announcing the new jurist’s appointment in March.
Judge “Steal” O’Neill was a “diversity” hire by Governor Lamont. His recent decision in Ambrose v. Riordan lacks experience and understanding.
After a two-day hearing, Judge O’Neill found that Riordan had abused their three children under Jennifer’s Law by forcing them to make “false claims” against their father, Ambrose.
The last judge who had the case, Judge Gladys Idelis Nieves, refused to bar Riordan from her children. She also denied Christopher Ambrose’s TRO applications out of hand. No hearing was required to determine whether the requests were legally defective or baseless. Judge Nieves has decades of family law experience.
Judge “Steal” O’Neill seems to have no family law experience. He held a two-day hearing with “show-trial” characteristics. The Judge would not allow the children or the mother’s medical experts to testify. To put it kindly, his decision is premised on multiple legal and factual errors and raises more questions than answers.
Why Did Connecticut Superior Court Judge Thomas J. O’Neill Blatantly Misapply the Law?
Acknowledging domestic abuse and its tell-tale signs, the Connecticut Legislature enacted Jennifers’ Law to protect vulnerable mothers and children. The law upended and replaced the prior paradigm that a child needs both parents in their lives, even if one of them is an abuser and dangerous to a child’s mental and physical health and safety.
Jennifer Dulos and Jennifer Mangano, the women after whom Jennifers’ Law was named, were both victims of murder by their ex-spouses (who both thereafter committed suicide). In both cases, alarming tell-tale signs of the potential risk of violence were present, but the courts were legally handcuffed.
Jennifers’ Law was intended to give judges and court personnel additional tools to stop domestic violence and abuse before fatal consequences.
Despite the best intentions, Jennifers’ Law is now being twisted to enable abusers and harm the vulnerable women and children it was designed to protect.
Basing his ruling on this law, Judge O’Neill sends the message that Karen Riordan, a 110-pound special education teacher, is a dangerous physical threat to Christopher Ambrose and her own children.
Judge “Steal” O’Neill’s removal of the mother from the teens’ life via restraining order is unique. The teens wanted the father restrained from abusing them, but the good judge denied them their mother without permitting them to tell their side of the story – making them homeless.
Judge Steal also chose to ignore the mother’s testimony, excluded evidence she tried to present to the court of Ambrose’s purported abuse, and ignored a letter to him from psychiatrist Dr. Bandy X. Lee, M.D., a noted expert in child abuse and psychopathy who interviewed the eldest child, Mia, and Riordan at length.
Dr. Lee refers to Ambrose as the children’s violent abuser and claims there is ample evidence that he is a psychopath. She is secure in her medical opinion, having never met Ambrose, which shows how dangerous he is.
It is medically accepted that Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, and Vlad the Impaler were dangerous psychopaths. That medical opinion is universally accepted and can be rendered without a personal examination of the subject.
Would Judge “Steal” O’Neill require a personal appearance by Hitler before declaring him a psychopathic mass murderer who belongs in the Seventh Circle of Hell? That is what Judge “Steal” O’Neill ruled in the Ambrose v. Riordan case.
Why wasn’t this evidence allowed on the record? Judge Nieves likely would have allowed it all in, respecting the due process rights for each party to have an opportunity to be heard. After all, Judge Nieves signaled at the July 21 appearance that she would entertain a hearing on Ambrose’s request to have Riordan arrested.
Judge Nieves would listen to all the facts and create a complete record. Why? Because that is how the law and the Connecticut courts have worked for a very long time. The Supreme Court of the United States even said so long before the rise of the Nazi Party in Europe:
Opinions of medical experts may be based as well upon facts within their personal knowledge, as upon a hypothetical case disclosed by the testimony of others. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Lathrop.
It is inexplicable why Judge O’Neill legally excluded the testimony of Dr. Bandy Lee, M.D., and the Ambrose children, rendering the entire “hearing” an absurd “show-trial” reminiscent of the totalitarians Judge “Steal” evidently knows so well.
Unless, of course, that was never “The Plan.”
Who is Being Protected?
A Connecticut Court Administration official decided to remove this critical and legally complex “first impression” case on Jennifer’s Law from a seasoned family court jurist with decades of family law experience and hand it to a “greenhorn” on the bench and in the legal area.
I have previously posited that Judge O’Neill’s outrageous decision was explainable in two ways.
One possibility is that Judge O’Neill truly is a judicial “rookie” and does not recognize the fundamental difference between cases about money and true justice. In his high-stakes corporate litigation background, the concern is never the “best interests” of any litigant, only the bottom line.
I also posited that “green” might have motivated Judge O’Neill’s outrageous decision. It was the price for moving Judge O’Neill down the hall to hearing “big dollar” commercial cases where his former partners at Day Pitney LLP and other “insiders” could wet their beaks in immense feeding troughs of legal fees.
It is Connecticut, after all. If you want answers, usually all you have to do is follow the money.
After reviewing some of the evidence in this case, another much more alarming possibility occurred to me.
The Connecticut “Cash For Kids” “Judicial Warranty” Program
I think Judge “Steal” O’Neill was “hand-selected” by Connecticut court administrators with the understanding that he would not make a complete record.
If the full factual record in the Ambrose v. Riordan case were to come to light, I believe the “cash cow” and “dark underbelly” of the Connecticut Family Court system would have become fully exposed. We would find in Connecticut what smacks of the racketeering conspiracy described by Frank Parlato.
I posit that the Connecticut Family Court “machine” had already “sold” the Ambrose children to Christopher Ambrose years ago. Ambrose paid all his bills, footing legal, GAL, and other related fees and “grift” payments. Judge Nieves was pushed aside, and Judge “Steal” O’Neill was appointed to the case because Connecticut administrators of justice could not afford to have Karen prevail.
More specifically, they could not allow the truth to emerge that the case had been a “contract” and “cover-up” from the beginning.
In the Connecticut Family Court, the only absolute requirement to buy children is that your money is green.
Again, this is my opinion and theory based on the evidence I have seen, and I shall present pertinent parts of it.
I welcome a healthy, respectful, and vigorous debate if you disagree. If you believe I am wrong and have evidence that may change my mind, I invite you to transmit it to me and the publishers of this publication.
Better yet, you can send it to Judge Steal himself at his public address. Or you can let this public servant know how you feel, which is your First Amendment right as a citizen. Maybe he will change his mind, but I doubt it. He will probably change assignments much more quickly. The Civil Division and “big money” commercial cases beckon:
Hon. Thomas J. O'Neill
Superior Court Judge - Family Matters
Judicial District Courthouse
1061 Main Street
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Tel (203) 579-7250
Fax (203) 579-6928
“Cash For Kids” Theories in CT Family Court Are Nothing New
Frank Parlato has been writing about the sale of the Ambrose children for some time.
Frank Parlato published these words about the Ambrose v. Riordan case almost a year and a half ago, and they were prophetic:
This is CT, and this is a family court under the shadow of Richard Gardner, who invented a way for well-to-do abusers and pedophiles to prevail – “parental alienation” – and it is used as a weapon to take money from the rich and give the children in return.
Parental alienation and its drastic remedy – once it is determined by any quack or con artist GAL or custody evaluator – is to take the children from the parent they love and order no contact with her – and hand them over to the abuser with money.
For those who say some mothers alienate their children from the father, which is true, I say children can be alienated from a father because he is a cruel ass, a cunning man, that the children see through him and want no part of him.
It does not have to be the other parent who alienates children from the parent. It can be the abuser himself.
But alienated the children, M, M, and S, because the father had the money and because he had CT family court – he could buy the children like you might buy a dozen eggs at the market.
That market is CT Family Court, and it is, arguably, as vicious and sinister a place as the world has known.
A Frank Report commentator had this opinion earlier today:
Judge O’Neill’s intervention upholds the values of a well-functioning business. His decision to bar the children from seeing their mother, but without specific orders of where the children will go after they have to leave their mother’s home, was a superb stroke of collaboration with our professionals, while still giving the customer, Mr. Ambrose, a chance to be made whole.
Damning evidence has been presented to public officials time and time again. Credible allegations of sexual abuse go ignored by Judges, Attorneys, the police, and the Connecticut Department of Children and Families (DCF).
Why? Because the selling of children to the highest bidder is good for business. It is a “cash cow.”
As seen in this case, “connected” Westport, Connecticut family law attorneys like Edward Nusbaum and Alexander Cuda (Ambrose’s most recently-retained lawyer) can charge clients $750 per hour and upwards. Court-appointed GALs rack up steady fees. There are experts, investigators, doctors, and professionals to be paid. Their legal fees secure the ultimate result for the party with the most resources to commit - to put into the feeding trough.
In Connecticut Family Court, the inventory is children. And like good dealers, they will sell to anyone with cash in hand without caveat. Pedophile? No problem! Just don’t break the merchandise until after you leave the store.
And broken the Ambrose children have become, like countless other Connecticut children.
Family Law “Lifers” like Judges Jane Kupson Grossman and Gerard I. Adelman know the game. And they don’t get in the way. They do everything they can to keep the feeding trough full by keeping a revolving carousel of inventory.
I submit that certain judges are the guardians of this corrupt machine. By excluding evidence and outlandish rulings, they can keep this dark underbelly from becoming exposed. All the paid participants can remain fat and happy while the system churns. Broken families and damaged children are “acceptable losses.” They are like “breakage” in a retail establishment. They are factored into the cost of doing business.
The most important role is guarding the “Cash For Kids” deal. If a “client” pays and doesn’t get their product, it threatens the entire marketplace. The spigot must remain open—at all costs.
And that, in my opinion, explains Judge “Steal” O’Neill’s troubling decision. There is one dirty secret that, if made public, would threaten the entire “cash for kids” scheme. It would decimate entire cottage industries and the bottom lines of family law attorneys.
The secret is: In Connecticut, kids can be sold to anyone, even pedophiles if they have the money.
The Ambrose Case is a Roadmap of How the Court System Aids and Abets a “Pedophile Sale”
The have been numerous allegations about Christopher Ambrose’s pedophilia. None of them find their way into the Court’s record, so the Judges don’t have to do anything about them. Pesky pedophilia - it’s bad for business.
Frank Report has previously released materials on Christ Ambrose’s “reign of terror” over his children, who remain in fear of his sexual abuse.
These allegations are not new. The Madison, Connecticut, Police Department first learned of them in January 2021.
South Central Child Advocacy Center in New Haven is a mandated reporter of child sexual abuse. The encounter below happened in November 2020.
Madison Police finally took the report on January 29, 2021, about sexual abuse allegations against Christopher Ambrose by his children. The report states:
Later in the interview Monica Vidro Madigan reminded XXXXX that her job was to make sure that kids are safe and their bodies are healthy. She asked-if anyone was worried about him. XXXXX replied, "My mom." He further said "Our dad, he's like not really nice." "And, he touches me and he's touched my sister, but he hasn't touched my brother." She asked if he could describe a time that he remembered best when his father touched him, and for XXXXX to tell her all about it. XXXXX said that one time when he and his dad were sitting watching TV in the living room, his dad would start tickling him. He demonstrated that his father touches him "here" and put his right hand on his upper inner right thigh area. Monica Vidro Madigan then told XXXXX that she had a picture that she shows to all kids that she talks to. She asked XXXXX if he saw the body part on the picture, and for XXXXX to put an X on the area that dad touches. XXXXX marked an X on the inner upper thigh area on the drawing. He said that he touches that area, and sometimes closest to his private part.
Monica Vidro Madigan asked XXXXX if he could circle the private part on the drawing, and XXXXX circled the penis. He clarified this by saying sometimes his dad touches him close to his private part, and sometimes his dad touches his private part. XXXXX said that it happened more than one time.
In one instance of his dad touching him, XXXXX said that it happened in XXXXX's bedroom. He said that his dad was resting in his bed. He said that his dad sometimes rests in his bed or his brothe-bed. XXXXX entered his bedroom and asked his dad if he could go to the skate park with his friend XXXXX. His dad got up off the bed and texted XXXXX's mother. XXXXX said that he sat on his bed, and that his dad came back on the bed and began "tickling him all over. XXXXX then stated "Then he stopped and he put his hand over my private part, and I said stop. Monica Vidro Madigan asked if XXXXX could describe what it felt like. He said, "Kind of tickling, but not really. His hand was kind of like just there." "It felt like he was tickling me, but I don't think he was." Monica Vidro Madigan asked "what makes you think he wasn't?" XXXXX replied that he just stopped (tickling) and that it felt weird. She asked if this was okay that Dad touched him in that way and he said "No".
XXXXX said that he remembered two other times when a similar touching took place, and he said that it occurred on the living room couch while watching television. XXXXX said that the first time any touching incident happened was when he was XXXXX and the last time was before he went back with his mom (12/1/20). XXXXX said that he was nervous that he would have to go back with his dad, because he did not want his dad to touch him inappropriately.
The Officer who took the report is William J. DeGoursey, and the Sergeant who signed off is Robert N. Mulhern. The Madison, Connecticut Sheriff, Jack Drumm, has shown a pattern of ignoring serious criminal behavior when Christopher Ambrose is involved. It appears he has been “read in.” Here is a redacted copy of the first page of the police report:
Ambrose “Punishes” His Children For Talking to DCF, Medical Professionals About Abuse
Mia Ambrose was subsequently punished by Christopher Ambrose for reporting abuse to CT DCF and medical professionals - “what happened in New Haven…no more.”
What Ambrose characterizes as “monitoring” his children is just that. I believe he is fearful his documented psychopathic and pedophile behavior will be exposed:
It is clear that the children, when under their father’s custody, suffer abuse and live in fear. They are afraid to say anything that might “trigger” their father. One can only question how long sexual abuse went unreported because of the children’s fears of their father’s retaliation.
Judge “Steal” O’Neill considered none of this evidence. Mia, Matthew, and Sawyer were not permitted to testify.
CT Superior Court: Ambrose is a “High Risk” of “Potential Danger”
Multiple reports expose alarming behavior concerning Christopher Ambrose. In a December 2020 risk assessment report, Allison Kass, Esq., a Connecticut Superior Court Attorney, found Christopher Ambrose a “High Risk” of “potential danger” to Karen Riordan.
Judge Adelman did not mention this report in his 2021 decision. He seems too interested in Paul Boyne to read the Ambrose v. Riordan file. And why would he? The kids had already been sold.
Judge “Steal” O’Neill probably never even know of the existence of this report. And why would he? This past week’s hearing had a very limited purpose: find reasons to uphold the contract of sale of the Ambrose children to their “psychopathic,” “dangerous,” pedophile father. His money was green, after all.
New Allegations of Sexual Penetration Come to Light in June 2023
Recent allegations of sexual penetration by Christopher Ambrose are discussed in an email exchanged between a court-appointed attorney for one of the Ambrose children and the Connecticut DCF in June 2023:
When we spoke previously, you indicated that the most recent report included allegations against XXXXX’s father, including a new allegation of penetration. This is the first time I have learned that there are allegations in the most recent report regarding the safety of the children in their XXXXX’s home. Is that correct?
You decide what to make of the “new allegation of penetration.” From the context of the email, it appears that Christopher Ambrose’s repeated sexual penetration is common knowledge inside Connecticut DCF.
Allegations in Filed Juvenile Petitions
Mia Ambrose filed a petition with the Connecticut Superior Court for Juvenile Matters in April, alleging Christopher Ambrose’s “history of documented abuse.”
A month later, in May, Matthew left Christopher Ambrose’s house to reunite. Matthew also filed his own petition with the Connecticut courts. Their younger brother, Sawyer, joined them on Independence Day.
“I am not claiming any abuse against my mother, Karen Riordan. She has never abused me, and supports my social and emotional health,” Mia Ambrose’s petition reads.
Mia and her brothers are all adopted. Mia and Matthew are of Guatemalan descent, and Sawyer is half-Mexican. The children have recordings of their father, Christopher Ambrose, routinely using abusive and racist names like “beaner" to denigrate the children.
Ambrose routinely calls Mia dumb, “body-shames,” and gaslights her:
“DCF records show we were found to be unsafe in my father’s care. He has abused us verbally on a daily basis, isolated us from mother and entire extended family, threatens us with police and lies to everyone,” Mia Ambrose’s petition states.
Ambrose extensively records his children’s activities, smaking of the obsessive and “psychopathic”:
“My brother is high on a daily basis...[Ambrose] allows adults to be in [the] house/be with minors...[and] allows men to sleep in beds with 15 and 16-year-old girls,” the petition states.
The most disturbing part of the petition is where Mia Ambrose recounts Christopher Ambrose’s inappropriate sexual contact.
"[I]t got to the point where he would grab my butt or my breasts. When I objected, he said, 'Stop being a baby. It’s just a prank.' I would walk to the bathroom. The next thing I knew, I was getting grabbed from behind. My father would grab my butt with his hand and squeeze it. I told my father I was uncomfortable with him touching me. He would say, 'it's just a joke. You're being a baby.' "
Mia Ambrose recounts that Christopher Ambrose would try to watch his daughter shower and change.
"My room was in the basement at my dad's house, which had no lock. My father started to come down when I was changing or taking a shower. It happened almost every day...It got to the point where I would change in a locked bathroom because he would otherwise come in just when I was changing."
Christopher Ambrose’s Madison, Connecticut Den of Iniquity
The statement also claims Christopher Ambrose incessantly allows underage drinking, drug use, and sex in his Madison, Connecticut, home. Ambrose is fully aware of the activities and does not stop them. He glorifies them.
"[Christopher Ambrose] knew there was alcohol. One day, he said he heard older male voices in the basement. Then he said, 'I found a condom under your bed. I just want to make sure you and your friends are being safe. I'm glad you guys are using protection.' He permitted this behavior, knowing the boys were over 18, some men were in their twenties, and the girls were as young as 14."
Christopher Ambrose incessantly allows underage drinking, drug use, and sex in his home. Ambrose is fully aware of the activities and does not stop them. He glorifies them.
Christopher Ambrose has allowed and encouraged his home to become a den of iniquity. Men aged 23 regularly have sex with children aged 14 and 15 after plying them with alcohol and drugs.
This is not “fun” or “safe.” This is child rape. The law provides consequences that are being wholesale ignored to keep the Family Court “Cash For Kids” spigot open.
Here are some of the pictures. Decide for yourself whether the Family Court should consider this evidence and whether a law enforcement investigation is warranted:
Allowing an underage drinking party in your Connecticut home can get you busted under CS section 30-89a - Permitting a Minor to Illegally Possess Alcohol, a class A misdemeanor.
Section 53-21 makes it a felony for an adult to place a child in a situation where their health or morals are likely to be impaired.
These laws are often enforced. Connecticut parents were recently arrested for serving alcohol to minors at a house party where a 17-year-old was stabbed to death.
The allegations that Christopher Ambrose knowingly allowed underage drinking, sex, and drug use are more than serious. Mia Ambrose claims that her father supplies the alcohol and that girls as young as fourteen are having sex with men as old as twenty-three.
Christopher Ambrose and Connecticut “Cash For Kids” to Pedophiles Must Be Stopped
Christopher Ambrose has been accused of stealing a great many things. He plagiarized a Hollywood script. He stole children from a loving mother, dwindling her assets in the process. He steals the time and resources of Connecticut law enforcement and the courts through his incessant complaints and litigious conduct.
To date, all of this has been tolerated by the Connecticut courts, judges, attorneys, public officials, law enforcement, and DCF. The Family Court “gravy train” can’t be derailed by mere theft. Ambrose bought his kids fair and square.
Now, Christopher Ambrose is allowing children’s innocence, virtue, and morals to be stolen in his home. Ambrose is not only creating a dangerous situation and violating the law but also condoning child rape. Hopefully, he will be investigated and prosecuted.
But Ambrose’s behavior should never be tolerated, let alone protected and ignored.
How, in good conscience, could Judge Thomas J. “Steal” O’Neill not allow this evidence in the record? He knew about it all because he asked about Luthmann’s Amicus Letter on the record. Judge Steal knew all about underage drugs, drinking, and sex - all felonies under Connecticut law. He knew all about multiple allegations of sexual penetration against Christopher Ambrose. He has control over Connecticut DCF and can command Attorney Curely, an officer of the court, to appear.
Judge Thomas J. “Steal” O’Neill ignored it all. He looked the other way. He didn’t even slow down. Day Pitney LLP needs him to hear commercial cases. That is why Governor Ned Lamont was convinced to appoint him in March.
How could any judge not balance these most heinous activities against Christopher Ambrose’s demands? What kind of Judges sit on the Connecticut bench if even apparent pedophilia is not enough to compel conscience to overtake corruption and grift?
The monsters that sparked Jennifer’s Law - Dulos and Mangano - did everyone a favor - especially their children - after they had murdered an innocent. Maybe their final earthly act will be taken into account on Judgment Day. In Divine Mercy, they may yet find the path to forgiveness through the pain of Purgatory.
But for the life of me, I cannot grasp how Christopher Ambrose is deserving of anything.
He does not deserve a court finding in his favor based on his actions, which offended the laws of God and man.
He is deserving of no clemency.
And if, after a fair and speedy trial, the sexual abuse of the Ambrose children, his own adopted children, is proven in a Court of Law, that man deserves to be put down into Hellfire, both in this life and the next.
Read Frank Report’s Coverage
Richard Luthmann is a writer, commentator, satirist, and investigative journalist with degrees from Columbia University and the University of Miami. Once a fixture in New York City and State politics, Luthmann is a recovering attorney who lives in Southwest Florida and a proud member of the National Writers Union.
“I am a journalist who writes about justice, the courts, government officials, prisons, and reform. You find some questionable players in all these places and often outright crooks. Exposing these bottom feeders from the outside is sometimes the only way to make them pay the price for their injustice and misdeeds.”
“I use satire and opinion to make my point. I have already been told to ‘stop writing about the Government’ by the U.S. Government, so I must be doing something right.”
“If you’re a victim of the system, maybe the press is the right forum for you. If you have experienced injustice and are tired of dropping tens of thousands of dollars without results, maybe it’s time to try the digital pen.”
Contact Richard Luthmann at 239-631-5957 or richard.luthmann@protonmail.com.
"Nihil est incertius vulgo, nihil obscurius voluntate hominum, nihil fallacius ratione tota comitiorum.” (Nothing is more unpredictable than the mob, more obscure than public opinion, and more deceptive than the whole political system.)
~ Marcus Tullius Cicero
The news media is a critical check on the powerful, serving as a watchdog to hold elected officials and other public figures accountable for their actions. The media was first called the Fourth Estate in 1821 by Edmund Burke, who wanted to point out the power of the press. The press plays a crucial role in providing citizens with access to information about what is happening in government and by shining a light on corruption, abuse of power, and other forms of wrongdoing.
Thank you for sharing this. While reading this post, I was burning with rage to comment on it and now that I'm here, I'm slack-jawed and left without words. I first learned about how corrupt our CPS networks are, through looking into the murder of former state senator Nancy Schaefer (R), of Georgia along with her husband. It was unconvincingly ruled a murder/suicide. She was a tireless champion for the children who became victims of the well-oiled, unbelievably criminal and disgusting machine that is referred to as the "Child Protective Services". She was preparing to release a documentary, shortly before her murder. I can't imagine any agency that is more misnamed and harmful than CPS. They are in league with family courts, attorneys and judges, as well as foundations and NGOs that purport to be concerned with the health, safety and well-being of children. Instead, they have turned the system into a huge, lucrative, child-trafficking operation, that infects our entire nation. I also looked into the June 2019 death of former Oklahoma state senator Jonathan Nichols (R), who was also looking into his state's CPS. He was found in his home with a gunshot wound to the chest and in a hasty investigation, it was ruled "self-inflicted", although the gun was on a table across the room. Another state senator from Arkansas, Linda Collins-Smith (R), was murdered around the same time and she was also looking into the CPS of her state. Her murderer turned out to be a former campaign aide. As to the exposé at hand, this just solidifies my conviction that all of these cases are true, and the "coincidences" are too flagrant to ignore. These govt employees are just as guilty of the most despicable crimes against humanity, as is the father, who no doubt adopted his children with this horrendous purpose in mind. That our govt aids and abets him, is beyond evil. The scope and depth of this evil has yet to be revealed. It rises to the scale of the Marc Dutroux case in Belgium. I'm sickened to my very soul. I'm silently screaming as I write this. How do we stop this monstrous disgrace?
https://www.silive.com/crime-safety/2021/08/trial-by-combat-lawyer-richard-luthmann-released-from-federal-custody.html