1 Comment

FROM THE DESK OF Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, American and Beneficiary in Equity-Executor

JUNE 12, 2024

PUBLIC NOTICE

CGS 54-170 ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT

CONNECTICUT: LOSS OF AUTHORITY FOR ALL JUDGES, STATE REFEREES, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREES, AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS REQUIRING OATH OF OFFICE.

“RACKETEERING”, “ENEMY”, “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”, “BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS”, “GENOCIDE” AND “TREASON” AS DEFINED BY LAW.

THE CONNECTICUT GOVERNMENT IS “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION”

The Constitution is harmed by subverting its authority as the foundational law of the land. A domestic enemy is any American who either promotes foreign invasion or attacks the Bill of Rights. The former assaults national stability. The latter assaults individual freedoms.

1982 Connecticut’s Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branch committed “War against the Constitution” (Treason) as an “Enemy” by eliminating the use of a GRAND JURY made up of the people, an inalienable right.

"THE TROJAN HORSE" was a new creation called an INVESTIGATORY GRAND JURY defined by statute as a judge, constitutional state referee, or three-judge panel appointed “to conduct an investigation into the commission of a crime or crimes” (see CGS § 54-47b).

All Judges, State Referees, and Judge Trial Referees willfully violate the law. There is NO DUE PROCESS in Connecticut Courts. The Complicit Judges willfully use and work with Complicit State Referees and Complicit Judge Trial Referees to put forward a FICTION CASES WITHOUT AUTHORITY.

The Complicit Judges’ Misprision of Felony willfully disregarding that State Referees and Judge Trial Referees violate the requirements of CGS 51-44a [Judicial Selection Commission. Members. Duties. Nomination of judges by Governor] enable “Racketeering” and the “Weaponization” of the Judicial Branch. (see CGS § 52-434 & CGS 51-44a).

This fictional authority exerted by Complicit Judges and other Complicit Participants gives the “ENEMY” absolute power.

For Example: Nemo Judex in Causa Sua ("no one is judge in their own case") an axiom of Common Law and common sense is willfully disregarded by the Complicit Judges and Complicit Participants. Just read the following unconstitutional Connecticut General Statutes empowering the “ENEMY”.

Sec. 51-183d. (Formerly Sec. 51-42). Disqualified judge; proceedings not void. If a judge acts in any legal proceeding in which he is disqualified, the proceeding shall not by reason thereof be void, but such action shall constitute an irregularity of which advantage may be taken by appeal or, where no appeal lies, by proceedings in error.

AND HERE IS WHAT OUR U.S. SUPREME COURT SAYS ABOUT THAT:

30A Am Jur Judgments '' 44, 45. A void judgment is not entitled to the respect accorded a valid adjudication, but may be entirely disregarded, or declared inoperative by any tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to it. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place. ... It is not entitled to enforcement ... All proceedings founded on the void judgment are themselves regarded as invalid.

Ableman v. Booth, 21 Howard 506 (1859) "No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence."

Fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

“Inalienable Rights”

The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life.

Supreme Court Case Law:

U.S. v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187,

The Supreme Court has warned: "Because of what appear to be Lawful commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance."

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Unlimited Power to Connecticut Judges in 1982

CONNECTICUT GRAND JURY LAW Grand Jury Indictment Requirement Repealed: When Connecticut repealed the requirement of a grand jury indictment before a person can be tried for any crime punishable by death or life imprisonment, it substituted a probable cause hearing requirement.

It retained the investigatory grand jury, defined by statute as a judge, constitutional state referee, or three-judge panel appointed “to conduct an investigation into the commission of a crime or crimes” (see CGS § 54-47b).

This Act of “War against the Constitution” gave unlimited rogue power to the Judicial Branch of Connecticut. No longer was there a check on Judicial Power by “We the People”.

The people Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion in United States v. Williams, 1992 has been relied on to refer to grand juries as a fourth branch of government.

In that opinion, Scalia wrote: [T]he grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It 'is a constitutional fixture in its own right' [case cites]. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.[10]

CONNECTICUT’S GOVERNMENT IS AT “WAR WITH THE CONSTITUTION” AND HAS “NO AUTHORITY”.

As a Trojan horse, Connecticut is one of the leaders on the fraudulent construct of Foreclosure Racketeering/property theft, attacking 1st Amendment "Alex Jones" and attacking 2nd Amendment "Sandy Hook/Remington Arms".

This is not a political statement.

It is the obvious and grotesque violations of the rights of the U.S. Constitution, “The Supreme Law of the Land”, with all the authority defined by The Judiciary Act of 1789 during the first session of the First United States Congress [Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution prescribed that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts"] developed and demonstrated by weaponized fictional adjudication.

The Covid 19 “Domestic Terrorism” lock down executed by the Connecticut Government did irreparable harm to the 3,625,000 approx. people that live here. Churches, Courts, and other necessary facilities were immediately closed, and all were ordered to put on your mask.

The “ENEMY” Connecticut Courts went as far as executing “Remote Hearings” without any Jurisdiction to do so. It made it much easier for the “ENEMY” to “SEIZE” and/or hit their target or objective.

The “ENEMY” Connecticut Government with its “SEIZED” power can control the State of Connecticut to execute “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” through uncontested fear.

The “ENEMY” Connecticut Government ordered State Employees, Health Workers and others to take a “BIOLGICAL WEAPON” fraudulently represented as a COVID 19 VACCINATION.

Please note: the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Acknowledges Plaintiffs' Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Jab is NOT a Vaccine, But a Therapeutic, Opinion filed June 7, 2024.

Please note: Dr. Francis A. Boyle the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act: Author Of 1989 Law has stated COVID IS A BIOWEAPON and meets the legal definition of “GENOCIDE” as reflected in his May 27, 2024, AFFIDAVIT Below:

Expand full comment