Paul Boyne argues that his prosecution violates the First Amendment. Is this a case of free speech under fire in Connecticut?
Interesting. Unless I overlooked it I don't see any direct threats or incitement. He does seem however rather stupid.
The complainants in the arrest warrant are all judges. I guess the rules change based on who the victim is in CT.
CT has their own rules for every situation….especially when it comes to family court.
Interesting. Unless I overlooked it I don't see any direct threats or incitement. He does seem however rather stupid.
The complainants in the arrest warrant are all judges. I guess the rules change based on who the victim is in CT.
CT has their own rules for every situation….especially when it comes to family court.