Paul Boyne argues that his prosecution violates the First Amendment. Is this a case of free speech under fire in Connecticut?
Interesting. Unless I overlooked it I don't see any direct threats or incitement. He does seem however rather stupid.
The complainants in the arrest warrant are all judges. I guess the rules change based on who the victim is in CT.
CT has their own rules for every situation….especially when it comes to family court.
This is criminal impersonation, I believe by BEERMANN LLP and others:
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/law-firm-from-hell-beermann-llp-accused
Interesting. Unless I overlooked it I don't see any direct threats or incitement. He does seem however rather stupid.
The complainants in the arrest warrant are all judges. I guess the rules change based on who the victim is in CT.
CT has their own rules for every situation….especially when it comes to family court.
This is criminal impersonation, I believe by BEERMANN LLP and others:
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/law-firm-from-hell-beermann-llp-accused