Watch now | Judge Farber shuts down NJ Lawyer Jessica Sprague’s “Lethal Injection to Journalism” Motion to Silence Protective Mom and Media in Divorce Court Circus
custody case in New Jersey I am outraged, this case has faced significant delays and unexpected changes in judges. The latest twist involves Judge farber who took over the case from Judge Carolina without explanation. This sudden shift has raised questions about the fairness of the proceedings.
The case has been ongoing for nearly three years, and now, with a trial set in just five weeks, concerns are mounting. The pro se litigant, representing herself, is expected to gather her witnesses and travel from Florida to Nj for the trial.? Wow! Many are questioning how a single individual can manage such a complex situation, especially with the financial burden of hiring a trial lawyer estimated at $20,000. What law firm would touch this complex litigation that’s politically driven with a 10 foot pole a pro se litigant who’s been advocating for her child now they want trial.?!
Critics argue that the court's actions resemble a "kangaroo court," suggesting that the system is rigged against the litigant. They claim this is not about justice but rather about protecting political interests. The well-being of children involved in the case is at stake, and many are calling for a reevaluation of the process.
As the situation unfolds, the community is left wondering how the judicial system can prioritize political agendas over the welfare of vulnerable children.
I am now questioning if “they” were suppressing evidence from Judge Farber that Cristin gave to the courts last year. She kept saying that the courts already have this. Or, is this another tactic that the court uses to drag out these divorce/family court cases?
Morris County are expressing outrage over recent court decisions that they believe lack fairness and due process. A parent has voiced strong concerns regarding a case involving a private loan and a pool built three years prior to going to court? The individual claims that the court did not request any documentation related to the pool, leading to accusations of a "kangaroo court."
The situation escalated when Judge Bogaard was asked to recuse himself from the case. Critics argue that the judge's actions appear retaliatory, suggesting that the court is prioritizing its interests over the welfare of a child involved in the proceedings. Many community members feel that the judicial system is being manipulated to protect political interests rather than serving justice.
This controversy has sparked discussions about the integrity of the legal system in Morris County. Advocates for fair treatment are calling for transparency and accountability within the court to ensure that the best interests of children are prioritized. As the situation develops, people, remain vigilant, hoping for a resolution that upholds justice and fairness.
Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938)
"Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."
Residence of, Morris County and other states are expressing outrage over recent court decisions that they believe lack fairness and due process. A parent has voiced strong concerns regarding a case involving a private loan and a pool built three years ago. The individual claims that the court did not request any documentation related to the pool, leading to accusations of a "kangaroo court."
The situation escalated when Judge Bogaard was asked to recuse himself from the case. Critics argue that the judge's actions appear retaliatory, suggesting that the court is prioritizing its interests over the welfare of a child involved in the proceedings. Many community members feel that the judicial system is being manipulated to protect political interests rather than serving justice.
This controversy has sparked discussions about the integrity of the legal system in Morris County. Advocates for fair treatment are calling for transparency and accountability within the court to ensure that the best interests of children are prioritized. As the situation develops, people, remain vigilant, hoping for a resolution that upholds justice and fairness.
custody case in New Jersey I am outraged, this case has faced significant delays and unexpected changes in judges. The latest twist involves Judge farber who took over the case from Judge Carolina without explanation. This sudden shift has raised questions about the fairness of the proceedings.
The case has been ongoing for nearly three years, and now, with a trial set in just five weeks, concerns are mounting. The pro se litigant, representing herself, is expected to gather her witnesses and travel from Florida to Nj for the trial.? Wow! Many are questioning how a single individual can manage such a complex situation, especially with the financial burden of hiring a trial lawyer estimated at $20,000. What law firm would touch this complex litigation that’s politically driven with a 10 foot pole a pro se litigant who’s been advocating for her child now they want trial.?!
Critics argue that the court's actions resemble a "kangaroo court," suggesting that the system is rigged against the litigant. They claim this is not about justice but rather about protecting political interests. The well-being of children involved in the case is at stake, and many are calling for a reevaluation of the process.
As the situation unfolds, the community is left wondering how the judicial system can prioritize political agendas over the welfare of vulnerable children.
I am now questioning if “they” were suppressing evidence from Judge Farber that Cristin gave to the courts last year. She kept saying that the courts already have this. Or, is this another tactic that the court uses to drag out these divorce/family court cases?
No Fairness in Morris County Court Proceedings
Morris County are expressing outrage over recent court decisions that they believe lack fairness and due process. A parent has voiced strong concerns regarding a case involving a private loan and a pool built three years prior to going to court? The individual claims that the court did not request any documentation related to the pool, leading to accusations of a "kangaroo court."
The situation escalated when Judge Bogaard was asked to recuse himself from the case. Critics argue that the judge's actions appear retaliatory, suggesting that the court is prioritizing its interests over the welfare of a child involved in the proceedings. Many community members feel that the judicial system is being manipulated to protect political interests rather than serving justice.
This controversy has sparked discussions about the integrity of the legal system in Morris County. Advocates for fair treatment are calling for transparency and accountability within the court to ensure that the best interests of children are prioritized. As the situation develops, people, remain vigilant, hoping for a resolution that upholds justice and fairness.
Keep going 💪. Shine the light
Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.
Maty v. Grasselli Chemical Co., 303 U.S. 197 (1938)
"Pleadings are intended to serve as a means of arriving at fair and just settlements of controversies between litigants. They should not raise barriers which prevent the achievement of that end. Proper pleading is important, but its importance consists in its effectiveness as a means to accomplish the end of a just judgment."
No Fairness in Morris County Court Proceedings
Residence of, Morris County and other states are expressing outrage over recent court decisions that they believe lack fairness and due process. A parent has voiced strong concerns regarding a case involving a private loan and a pool built three years ago. The individual claims that the court did not request any documentation related to the pool, leading to accusations of a "kangaroo court."
The situation escalated when Judge Bogaard was asked to recuse himself from the case. Critics argue that the judge's actions appear retaliatory, suggesting that the court is prioritizing its interests over the welfare of a child involved in the proceedings. Many community members feel that the judicial system is being manipulated to protect political interests rather than serving justice.
This controversy has sparked discussions about the integrity of the legal system in Morris County. Advocates for fair treatment are calling for transparency and accountability within the court to ensure that the best interests of children are prioritized. As the situation develops, people, remain vigilant, hoping for a resolution that upholds justice and fairness.
Judge Farber was fair to the press, I felt honored when the judge put Sprague in her place….Several times.
Nice!