By Richard Luthmann
President Trump’s unprecedented pardons and clemency for over 1,500 Lawfare hostages have brought new attention to the lingering political and legal fallout of January 6.
Evan Neumann, a 50-year-old software developer turned fugitive by the Biden Department of Justice (DOJ), can finally come home. The J6 hostage is free to return from exile in Belarus.
His pardon has reignited debate over President Trump’s use of the pardon power. Neumann’s escape story from what he called “politically motivated” charges became the centerpiece of a fiery exchange between investigative journalists Richard Luthmann and Michael Volpe on The Unknown Podcast.
Neumann recounted his tale in an emotional interview with Cara Castronuova for The Gateway Pundit, which occurred days before the Presidential Inauguration.
“I’ve waited years to hug my kids again,” he said, reflecting on his journey from the Capitol steps, through Ukrainian and Belarusian swamps, to asylum and exile, and now to Liberation.
Neumann, labeled a fugitive by the Biden Department of Justice, became a symbol of the J6 prosecutions that divided the nation. Luthmann praised President Trump’s decision as long overdue.
“These people were hostages of a political witch hunt. President Trump did what any decent person would do—he freed them.”
Volpe, however, expressed skepticism about the pardons, questioning their broader implications.
The J6 Video: Clash of Perspectives
The discussion reached a boiling point when Luthmann and Volpe analyzed a newly released J6 video. Luthmann argued the footage supported his belief that Democrats orchestrated an “inside job” to undermine President Trump’s challenge of the rigged 2020 election.
“The video shows clear coordination. How many of them are ANTIFA, and how many are undercover Feds,” Luthmann asserted. “They turned peaceful protests into chaos to frame Trump’s supporters.”
“I think I see Ray Epps!” Luthmann quipped.
Volpe pushed back, questioning the narrative.
“You can’t pin all of this on Democrats,” he said. “Some of these people crossed the line. Are you saying they shouldn’t be held accountable?”
Echoing the sentiments of NYC Council Member Joe Borelli, Luthmann fired back.
“Murderers walk free every day in New York and California, but peaceful protesters spent years in prison for standing up for election integrity. Where’s the accountability for that?”
Democrats in Disarray
President Trump’s pardons have left Democrats seething. Federal prosecutors reportedly described their reaction as “guttural,” with many feeling their work had been erased overnight.
Luthmann dismissed their outrage, stating, “Democrats brought this on themselves. They weaponized the justice system against their political opponents. Now they’re shocked that President Trump used his constitutional authority to correct their overreach.”
Volpe remained cautious, pointing out the risks of pardoning en masse.
“The optics matter,” he said. “Even if some were peaceful, others weren’t. Trump’s blanket pardon muddies the water.”
Luthmann countered, “This was never about justice. It was about punishing President Trump and his supporters. The Democrats’ meltdown proves they know they overplayed their hand.”
Hostages or Criminals?
Neumann’s story highlights the broader controversy. After being charged with 14 offenses, including assault, Neumann fled the U.S., eventually finding asylum in Belarus. He maintained his innocence, claiming the charges were politically motivated.

“I stood up for election integrity,” Neumann said. “I didn’t attack anyone. The DOJ twisted the narrative to silence dissent.”
Luthmann echoed Neumann’s sentiment, calling him a “modern-day political exile.”
He argued that President Trump’s pardons were an act of justice, ensuring that “patriots” like Neumann could return home.
While sympathetic to some J6 defendants, Volpe expressed concerns about the precedent being set.
“We’re not just talking about peaceful protesters,” Volpe said. “What about those who engaged in violence?”
A Nation Divided, But Healing
President Trump’s pardons seek to heal existing divisions in America. Supporters see them as a necessary correction to years of political weaponization. Critics view them as an affront to law enforcement and justice.
“The Democrats wanted this fight, and they lost,” Luthmann said. “They thought they could destroy President Trump and this movement, but all they’ve done is galvanize a nation.”
Volpe remained unconvinced, emphasizing the complexity of the issue.
“This isn’t black and white,” he said. “Yes, some were treated unfairly, but sweeping pardons send the wrong message.”
One thing is clear: the battle over its legacy is far from over. For many, President Trump’s actions signal a step toward healing. For others, the road ahead remains uncertain.
Meanwhile, Neumann and other J6 hostages like him celebrate newfound freedom while a nation grapples with the aftermath of weaponized justice.
Share this post