4 Comments

Contrary to what you say, true threats are not protected under the free speech clause.

Expand full comment

That's not what either one of us said. We said that Paul joking about 50 Cals is not a true threat. No one believes he was making a threat. They wanted him jailed and conjured up charges.

Expand full comment

I never said they were. But we have a problem here. Because statements that are not true threats are being prosecuted. Even if the statements are questionable, the doubts should resolve in favor of the Constitution and individual rights.

Expand full comment

FROM THE DESK OF Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, American and Beneficiary in Equity-Executor

JUNE 12, 2024

PUBLIC NOTICE

CGS 54-170 ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT

CONNECTICUT: LOSS OF AUTHORITY FOR ALL JUDGES,

STATE REFEREES, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREES, AND

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS REQUIRING OATH OF OFFICE.

“RACKETEERING”, “ENEMY”, “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”,

“BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS”, “GENOCIDE” AND “TREASON” AS

DEFINED BY LAW.

THE CONNECTICUT GOVERNMENT IS “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION”

The Constitution is harmed by subverting its authority as the foundational law of the

land. A domestic enemy is any American who either promotes foreign invasion or

attacks the Bill of Rights. The former assaults national stability. The latter assaults

individual freedoms.

1982 Connecticut’s Legislative, Executive and Judicial Branch committed “War against the

Constitution” (Treason) as an “Enemy” by eliminating the use of a GRAND JURY made up of

the people, an inalienable right.

"THE TROJAN HORSE" was a new creation called an INVESTIGATORY GRAND JURY defined

by statute as a judge, constitutional state referee, or three-judge panel appointed “to conduct an

investigation into the commission of a crime or crimes” (see CGS § 54-47b).

All Judges, State Referees, and Judge Trial Referees willfully violate the law. There is NO DUE

PROCESS in Connecticut Courts. The Complicit Judges willfully use and work with Complicit

State Referees and Complicit Judge Trial Referees to put forward a FICTION CASES

WITHOUT AUTHORITY.

The Complicit Judges’ Misprision of Felony willfully disregarding that State Referees and Judge

Trial Referees violate the requirements of CGS 51-44a [Judicial Selection Commission.

Members. Duties. Nomination of judges by Governor] enable “Racketeering” and the

“Weaponization” of the Judicial Branch. (see CGS § 52-434 & CGS 51-44a).

This fictional authority exerted by Complicit Judges and other Complicit Participants gives the

“ENEMY” absolute power.

Expand full comment