Do you think Joette Katz could see these same standards are followed when family court judges brand and malign parents based on the words of fraudulent psychologists who act outside of their license and make bogus medical diagnosis in a public forum? Judges without any medical evidence make draconian orders to steal children from healthy, loving parents- often the parents never see their parent again.
For example, Judge Jane Grossman ordered child abuse whereby the parent could not respond to her children. She ordered children to be ignored by the parent they love. She put in an order of no contact because she was concerned that “the stress of the divorce could trigger a bi-polar episode”-
There never was bipolar, but even if it did exist J Grossman made punitive, discriminatory rulings which continue to punish three brown children and a loving parent to date. J Welsh played hot potato as three brown children were tortured by this order and that was only the beginning.
This blatant violation of ADA was challenged and every family court judge refused to take it up. J Welsh among others let it stay on the docket for a year.
J Adelman justified this no contact order in violation of ADA and in writing said it was meant to be “shock therapy”.
Lawyers, judges and GALs were pleased with the ADA violation that prolonged litigation and manufactured the need for court appointed buddies to remain on the case for years to come.
And AG Tong recently suggested that no one is above the law in CT.
He said this when we have family court attorneys like Jocelyn Hurwitz who wrote contracts where she states that her contract “supercedes” CT statutes. So Jocelyn Hurwitz gets paid to go above the law.
And when the litigant objected to her appointment, judges endorsed her appointment and endorsed her contract that “supercedes ct statutes” (at $400/hr) proving that, like Hurwitz, they are above the law. And they can and will protect attorneys and their lucrative contracts which violate statutes because it’s better for business.
I hope Joette Katz can look at these issues as well because they are indeed discriminatory against children and parents.
In 2011 a shift in the family court system related to the welfare reform act. Funding shifts all related to the economic growth of the country. You are not alone as a target. The court system labels prodomity women as mentally altered during divorce process. Many living a normal life until some type of situation accrues promting the onset of divorce. Suddenly they are crazy and suffering from some type of personality disorder or mental health issues. Often are symptoms of PTSD and CPTSD which escalate during the abusive court process. The experimental psychology professional is brought in cause the evidence based professionals usually don't go off on these types of things. They take symptoms of abuse and apply them to an rare diagnosis. Claiming they are the only ones qualified to make these diagnostic. Fight anyone else with credentials who says otherwise. There are plenty of reports on the harm it has caused especially to women and children. Ignored and falling on deaf ears. Comply with the fatherhood initiative agenda or loose your children. Unfortunately it is that black and white. Parental alienation, maternal gatekeeper malicious mommy mouchousen mommy all targeted at women. Separated from your children because it's been decided women are to blame for fatherless households in America. The department of social services and development of child and family services are all engaged in the funding. It's a project brushed under the table. Too bad women like you and myself are not told this from the family law attorneys. Why do you think so many wish to represent fathers. Women had to start representing themselves to get anywhere in court. It's a state wide initiative and the " family court system professional" all know about it. I would be shocked that the " reform group" and alienation industry say they don't. Parental alienation is used for men. The state of Connecticut is not concerned about mothers and their children. Fatherhood engagement at any cost. It's a blue print. It's a government project. Any mother going to family court complaining about parenting problems is a target. When you are the 23 percent showing up at the court house you are at the mercy of the judges pushing government solutions and projects. That includes unfair child support obligations in some cases for fathers. They are charging what ever the hell they want knowing that the push is for the desired outcome. Based on statistics not broken down. Under reported crime rates. The likelihood you may need public assistance. Your money is quickly spent by these attorneys on email and phone calls so you can not fight at the court house. Aimed at financially subdueing you into agreements that are not good for you and importantly not good for your children. To comply with aggressive stakeholder programs and statistics. These cases are not based on the best interest of an individual child. They are based on the blanket application of best interest of a government project starting in the state of Connecticut. The welfare reform and responsible fatherhood project. At great financial plunder of the parents going to court with dispute over some ones parenting problems. The laws are changing to protect the government project. Why do you think no one has been taken off the bench or disbarred? The wild West
Unfortunately more mysogisic approach to family court. It's not about the kids. will this be a heaven for domestic batters and child molesters? More propaganda for parental alienation? Paul Boyne was dedicated to children many abused. Paul wrote plenty of stories to expose the court handing children over and abuse of women. Especially in Connecticut. His antistism and racist remark may not have been approved of. But his commitment to children was. If you want to clean up the court. Please stop misinforming the public. Many people have been violated by the court. Stop bashing women. Pretending men are exclusively victims. Some of us have plenty of evidence to dispute that narrative. We ( women) are sick and tired of these BS statements.
I have been through the court system. If you think I have blinders on your mistaken. When you get locked out of court with evidence. A 16 year old arguing with another parent. For their own actions and conduct was the cause. Your talking to the wrong woman. There is too much money in the state of Connecticut for fatherhood given to the state of Connecticut. It's being abused. In many cases.
Do you think Joette Katz could see these same standards are followed when family court judges brand and malign parents based on the words of fraudulent psychologists who act outside of their license and make bogus medical diagnosis in a public forum? Judges without any medical evidence make draconian orders to steal children from healthy, loving parents- often the parents never see their parent again.
For example, Judge Jane Grossman ordered child abuse whereby the parent could not respond to her children. She ordered children to be ignored by the parent they love. She put in an order of no contact because she was concerned that “the stress of the divorce could trigger a bi-polar episode”-
There never was bipolar, but even if it did exist J Grossman made punitive, discriminatory rulings which continue to punish three brown children and a loving parent to date. J Welsh played hot potato as three brown children were tortured by this order and that was only the beginning.
This blatant violation of ADA was challenged and every family court judge refused to take it up. J Welsh among others let it stay on the docket for a year.
J Adelman justified this no contact order in violation of ADA and in writing said it was meant to be “shock therapy”.
Lawyers, judges and GALs were pleased with the ADA violation that prolonged litigation and manufactured the need for court appointed buddies to remain on the case for years to come.
And AG Tong recently suggested that no one is above the law in CT.
He said this when we have family court attorneys like Jocelyn Hurwitz who wrote contracts where she states that her contract “supercedes” CT statutes. So Jocelyn Hurwitz gets paid to go above the law.
And when the litigant objected to her appointment, judges endorsed her appointment and endorsed her contract that “supercedes ct statutes” (at $400/hr) proving that, like Hurwitz, they are above the law. And they can and will protect attorneys and their lucrative contracts which violate statutes because it’s better for business.
I hope Joette Katz can look at these issues as well because they are indeed discriminatory against children and parents.
In 2011 a shift in the family court system related to the welfare reform act. Funding shifts all related to the economic growth of the country. You are not alone as a target. The court system labels prodomity women as mentally altered during divorce process. Many living a normal life until some type of situation accrues promting the onset of divorce. Suddenly they are crazy and suffering from some type of personality disorder or mental health issues. Often are symptoms of PTSD and CPTSD which escalate during the abusive court process. The experimental psychology professional is brought in cause the evidence based professionals usually don't go off on these types of things. They take symptoms of abuse and apply them to an rare diagnosis. Claiming they are the only ones qualified to make these diagnostic. Fight anyone else with credentials who says otherwise. There are plenty of reports on the harm it has caused especially to women and children. Ignored and falling on deaf ears. Comply with the fatherhood initiative agenda or loose your children. Unfortunately it is that black and white. Parental alienation, maternal gatekeeper malicious mommy mouchousen mommy all targeted at women. Separated from your children because it's been decided women are to blame for fatherless households in America. The department of social services and development of child and family services are all engaged in the funding. It's a project brushed under the table. Too bad women like you and myself are not told this from the family law attorneys. Why do you think so many wish to represent fathers. Women had to start representing themselves to get anywhere in court. It's a state wide initiative and the " family court system professional" all know about it. I would be shocked that the " reform group" and alienation industry say they don't. Parental alienation is used for men. The state of Connecticut is not concerned about mothers and their children. Fatherhood engagement at any cost. It's a blue print. It's a government project. Any mother going to family court complaining about parenting problems is a target. When you are the 23 percent showing up at the court house you are at the mercy of the judges pushing government solutions and projects. That includes unfair child support obligations in some cases for fathers. They are charging what ever the hell they want knowing that the push is for the desired outcome. Based on statistics not broken down. Under reported crime rates. The likelihood you may need public assistance. Your money is quickly spent by these attorneys on email and phone calls so you can not fight at the court house. Aimed at financially subdueing you into agreements that are not good for you and importantly not good for your children. To comply with aggressive stakeholder programs and statistics. These cases are not based on the best interest of an individual child. They are based on the blanket application of best interest of a government project starting in the state of Connecticut. The welfare reform and responsible fatherhood project. At great financial plunder of the parents going to court with dispute over some ones parenting problems. The laws are changing to protect the government project. Why do you think no one has been taken off the bench or disbarred? The wild West
Keep going, I'm sure it comes as no surprise to you that the family court system is rigged against fathers all over America.
Unfortunately more mysogisic approach to family court. It's not about the kids. will this be a heaven for domestic batters and child molesters? More propaganda for parental alienation? Paul Boyne was dedicated to children many abused. Paul wrote plenty of stories to expose the court handing children over and abuse of women. Especially in Connecticut. His antistism and racist remark may not have been approved of. But his commitment to children was. If you want to clean up the court. Please stop misinforming the public. Many people have been violated by the court. Stop bashing women. Pretending men are exclusively victims. Some of us have plenty of evidence to dispute that narrative. We ( women) are sick and tired of these BS statements.
All evidence to the contrary my dear. Take off the liberal, feminist glasses your wearing. You might see better.
I have been through the court system. If you think I have blinders on your mistaken. When you get locked out of court with evidence. A 16 year old arguing with another parent. For their own actions and conduct was the cause. Your talking to the wrong woman. There is too much money in the state of Connecticut for fatherhood given to the state of Connecticut. It's being abused. In many cases.