Agree 100%. This is where it comes down to freedom versus oppression, rather than political party versus political party. However, some folks would rather give in to socialistic governance because it’s easier, because they do not want the responsibility that comes with preserving and ensuring honest freedom. H. G. Wells said: “The path of least resistance is the path of the loser.” Progressives truly believe the path of least resistance is safer, therefore, they’re going to install any politician—even an Islamist socialist—that caters to this dangerous naivety…and they will lose in the end.
If this happens, if Staten Island annexes to New Jersey, imagine what precedent this will set. This would cause a few heads to explode.
The choice is to fight, or to go feebly into the quiet night of socialism, to which death is preferable.
Agree 100%. This is where it comes down to freedom versus oppression, rather than political party versus political party. However, some folks would rather give in to socialistic governance because it’s easier, because they do not want the responsibility that comes with preserving and ensuring honest freedom. H. G. Wells said: “The path of least resistance is the path of the loser.” Progressives truly believe the path of least resistance is safer, therefore, they’re going to install any politician—even an Islamist socialist—that caters to this dangerous naivety…and they will lose in the end.