3 Comments
User's avatar
Maryann Petri's avatar

This is very disheartening to hear when a judge could’ve stopped it within a month from the very beginning. It’s no wonder that so many have no faith or trust in the legal system.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Richard Luthmann's avatar

It was redacted to remove certain sensitive information.

THEY opened the door by sanctioning the report about their mental health as part of a lawsuit that they brought.

THEY are asking for $26.5 million dollars based on marginal claims about mental health from a QUACK doctor.

THEY have not established causation: that the “injury” they have is a result of the Plaintiff’s activties.

THEY are PUBLIC FIGURES and have discussed their mental health in their content creation for their audence of over 2.5 million.

THEY and THEIR LAWYERS have discussed these issues in OPEN COURT.

What is happeneing isn’t “ABUSE.” It’s called REPORTING and JOURNALISM.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 2
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Richard Luthmann's avatar

You have a right to your opinions. And I think you shouldn't be kissing anyone on the lips.

Expand full comment