DOXXING FOR JUSTICE: FORT MYERS FEDERAL COURT FREE-FOR-ALL
Luthmann filed a $20 million lawsuit in the Middle District of Florida against Danesh Noshirvan—aka “ThatDaneshGuy”—for calling him a “pedophile” in a viral April 17, 2025, Substack post.
Doxxing For Justice: Richard Luthmann claims Libel Per Se.
Danesh never retracted. He never apologized.
Instead, he sent the article to thousands via email, many of them in Florida. Luthmann has the receipts.
Danesh didn’t send a retraction and apology to every email recipient. Instead, he and his dog-bite lawyer doubled down.
“I know a thing or two about Trial By Combat,” Luthmann grinned. “Danesh wants war? I’ll meet him on the field of battle—with every legal weapon available. And now, doxxing is one of them.”
Luthmann says it’s ironic that Danesh would call him a “pedophile” after his earlier statements.
“I think it’s projection. That’s my opinion,” Luthmann said.
THE JUDGES WHO SANCTIONED SILENCE
How did we get here? Blame the judges.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kyle Dudek had the first chance to stop Danesh months ago. He didn’t.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek
Now, Bill Clinton appointee U.S. District Judge John E. Steele is repeating the error—even when a Big Law partner, his firm, his family, and Bar Associations are targeted by Danesh’s hate mob.
Danesh falsely labeled Jackson-Fannin a racist and urged his 2.5 million followers to harass him—and Duane Morris offices in Miami and elsewhere. Fannin’s elderly mother in Georgia got threats. So did the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Bar Association, where Fannin is Vice President.
Duane Morris filed an emergency sanctions motion. Judge Steele’s answer? “Wait a month.”
“ORDER taking under advisement Garramone Plastic Surgery’s 334 Motion for Sanctions… set for 5/19/2025…,” Steele wrote in an order issued on April 23.
That’s how long victims of cancel culture doxxers must endure death threats in Fort Myers: thirty days.
It makes sense. Justice Kavanaugh waited a long time for the killers who came for him and his family after he was doxxed to be brought to justice.
The message the Biden DOJ sent is that this activity is tolerated. It’s the same message being received from radical left federal judges.
FROM THE SUPREME COURT TO THE SUBSTACK SEWER
Danesh Noshirvan is no stranger to targeting powerful people. After the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, Danesh doxxed the Justices’ home addresses.
He blasted them to his fanbase, inciting mobs outside private residences.
Danesh claims Luthmann only served him at his Boca Raton deposition because his “enemies” had allegedly leaked his location.
Wrong.
Doxxing For Justice: Federal court in Florida greenlights doxxing.
While he claims he has about as many enemies as would a paranoid schizophrenic, Danesh was served by a licensed process server as he walked into the U.S. Legal Support office.
How did Luthmann find him?
Easy.
Danesh asked for Boca Raton restaurant recommendations on social media 48 hours earlier.
Doxxing For Justice: Danesh Noshirvan telegraphs his own location on social media 48 hours before his deposition.
There are only a few on-site deposition and court reporter firms in town. It wasn’t espionage. It was good journalism and a great investigation.
Still, Danesh cried victim. It’s his playbook—same one he used against Julian Jackson-Fannin, Couture, Garramone, the SCOTUS, and even a Texas high school coach, Aaron De La Torre, who committed suicide after Danesh’s attacks.
“This guy doesn’t sue to win because he’s a LOSER,” Luthmann said. “He sues to smear, silence, and scare, with the added benefit of content creation.”
LUTHMANN’S TURN TO STRIKE BACK
Luthmann says he now has every legal right to do what Danesh has done: expose public figures, criticize litigants, and publish everything that isn’t sealed.
And that’s just what he’s going to do.
Doxxing For Justice: TikTok’s Danesh Noshirvan [L] and Investigative Journalist Richard Luthmann [R] are in a bitter legal and media feud with significant First Amendment implications.
“It’s not defamation,” Luthmann said. “It’s litigation. And if doxxing is allowed, then I’m going to use it, right here and right now.”
He already has. His complaint names not only Danesh but also others, including wife Hannah Noshirvan and Danesh’s lawyer, Nick Chiappetta, whom Luthmann calls a “dog-bite lawyer masquerading as a litigator.”
Chiappetta defended Danesh’s smear of a Black civil rights lawyer as “protected speech.” He called Duane Morris’s complaints “frivolous.”
Attorney Nick Chiappetta is an “ambulance chaser.”
Luthmann says Chiappetta is a fact witness in Luthmann v. Noshirvan. He says that Chiappetta’s claims about “retraction” to Duane Morris LLP lawyers are a central factual issue in the case. Luthmann maintains that because the libelous Substack publication was transmitted directly and personally to thousands, only direct and personal transmission, along with apologies, will be effective.
In effect, it is a factual dispute over the legal meaning of the word “retraction” as each party understands it in the context of Substack and other social media platforms.
“I’m going to get ‘Dickless Nick’ (*Litigation Privilege) rung out the same way the Feds made Bruce Culter go in the last Gotti trial,” Luthmann said. “Chiappetta is so intimately involved with Danesh Noshrivan, Hannah Noshrivan, James McGibney, Steven Jay Hatlestead, and others that the line between legal advice and personal culpability is non-existent. He goes beyond covering for his client. He is a fact witness and has concerted action liability, and that’s disqualifying.”
DOXXING FOR JUSTICE: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
With the federal court refusing to act, Luthmann says the only justice he’ll get is the kind he makes himself.
He has already requested that President Trump and the Executive Branch issue “letters of marque” to protect against Noshirvan and his co-conspirators. Reportedly, President Trump doesn’t like Danesh, and for good reason.
Now, he is launching a full lobbying effort to Speaker Johnson and other key stakeholders in Washington, D.C.
The U.S. Constitution allows for letters of marque: “Congress shall have Power… to grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal,” U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 11.
Luthmann says that Danesh and company are “domestic enemies of the constitution, the republic, and natural law,” and wishes to have them declared as such.
He says that, given the recent legal developments regarding doxxing and the law read in conjunction with the Litigation Privilege, his good-faith understanding is that releasing files on Danesh and his associates, as named in his filed complaint, is entirely within bounds.
He’s naming and shaming. He’s launching a counteroffensive using Danesh’s tactics, the very tactics the federal courts refused to stop.
And it’s all happening in broad daylight—on the same battlefield Danesh built.
“This is war,” Luthmann said. “The judiciary gave Danesh a license to dox. I’m going to use it. At least until I get my Letters of Marque from the Executive Branch. My understanding is that Secretary of State Rubio will issue it. But President Trump could sign it too, after Congress authorizes it.”
Luthmann made an extensive statement:
“I would like the world to know the following information for their safety and protection from the harms of doxxing and disinformation identified by Chief Justice Roberts and others. If SCOTUS Doxxer Danesh Noshirvan’s cancel culture mob associates come to kill you like they did to Aaron De La Torre, maybe you can contact them to make them stop. Or hopefully, this information may be helpful for the authortities, particularly Denton County Texas District Attorney Jason Richbourg:
Danesh Noshirvan 2411 Charleston Rd Mansfield, PA 16933-8857 714-293-9800 daneshnoshirvan@gmail.com daneshnoshirvan@yahoo.com dnoshirvan@cox.net dnoshirvan@valentinewoodworks.com IME REPORT SIA HOMES
Hannah L Butcher Noshirvan 2697 Carpenter Rd Wellsboro, PA 16901-8425 IME REPORT
Nicholas Anthony Chiappetta 1371 Hideaway Bnd Wellington, FL 33414-7979 312-523-5149 nchiappetta@eapl.org nicholaschiapetta@yahoo.com nick.chiappetta@us.mcd.com nick.chiappetta@yahoo.com nickchiappetta@yahoo.com Criminal Disposition: Poss Drug Parap. 12/02/1998 Illinois FINDING OF GUILTY MISDEMEANOR CLASS A Bankruptcy: Chapter 7 Closed 04/15/2008 0809195 Illinois Northern – Chicago
Steven Jay Hatlestad 2020 Scott St Hollywood, FL 33020-2417 239-204-8777 stevebouche@hotmail.com
According to record facts and Danesh’s own posts, in a recent sworn deposition, Danesh’s wife, Hannah Butcher Noshirvan, formerly employed as a Pennsylvania Dog Catcher, made multiple admissions that undercut their entire legal strategy and potentially expose Danesh to serious criminal charges for pornography production with children.
She said she and Danesh are in an “open relationship” and that she did not consent to appear in content uploaded to Danesh’s OnlyFans page.
She also admitted she never signed the legally required model releases under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2257 and 2257A.
But she said she did “suck [her] husband’s dick” on camera.
That may expose Danesh to federal child exploitation and adult content record-keeping violations.
If Danesh didn’t keep the legally required model releases under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2257 and 2257A, how do we know the other woman wasn’t underage?
Who is the other woman?
Hannah further said she didn’t know whether Danesh has an OnlyFans page, Danesh’s basis for the bogus “revenge porn” outburst against Attorney Jackson-Fannin.
No knowledge? That’s a problem.
And it’s not “revenge porn.” It was comercially-produced pornography, so it falls outside of the legal definition of revenge porn. Danesh’s claims there are moronic.
Content from the OF site—admittedly depicting Hannah and others performing sex acts on Danesh—has already been archived and referenced in court filings and may be a subject of inquiry for the FBI in the Middle District of Pennsylvania.”
This is very disheartening to hear when a judge could’ve stopped it within a month from the very beginning. It’s no wonder that so many have no faith or trust in the legal system.
This is very disheartening to hear when a judge could’ve stopped it within a month from the very beginning. It’s no wonder that so many have no faith or trust in the legal system.