what an outrage - ! So much abuse, so little justice....(btw, not sure the photo that accompanies the bereaved mother Elena Belogolovsky makes her look very bereaved. Pity one couldn't be found that seemed more bereaved rather than an Eastern European dating website profile photo...)
Typical pattern of abuse-- branding his ex-wife mentally ill with personality disorders that only he "diagnosed" her with. When the press exposes the truth and challenges the narrative, the abusers then shift and target anyone that threatens the false narrative. They've invested time and money to promote the false narrative and anyone that threatens their reality will be their next target. Thank you for your continued fearless investigations and public exposure of DARVO and the abusers manipulation of family court and the court appointed 'experts' who are paid solely by the monied spouse.
Maybe he doesn't feel like his sons death is foder for ambulance chasers? Maybe a Parent who loses a child should not be attacked especially when there is no evidence that they did anything wrong? Maybe have a little compassion and put yourself in that person shoes. I wonder how you would respond in that same situation?9
Ok, Dr. Gitter. Have the balls to respond to the press. Or have one of your "bounty hunter" lawyers return the call and say "no comment." You attack, attack, attack. Why? You've lost the moral high ground by the manner in which you conduct your affairs. What are you hiding?
It takes more courage not to respond to you (sorry but you are not "the press" unless the New York Times or someone else has recently hired you). You bizarrely attack his "male pattern baldness" in the same story where you complain of his ad hominin attack on you which is factual. His baldness is easily correctible. I have read the articles you posted on him and allowed his lunatic ex-wife to attack him pretending to be some sort of victim who could care less about the death of HIS young child and lied repeatedly about the FACTS of the case stated here https://casetext.com/case/belogolovsky-v-gitter. Her behavior is clear proof that she was an uncaring and unfit mother to begin with. Her son tragically dies and all she does is attack the father. That is her only concern. It was easy enough to fact check her, but you didn't do that. Everything she claimed was a lie. But you didn't mention that. You didn't bother to check information that is publicly available. This man, who by all accounts is a very good person, owes nothing to you or that woman, who by her own account is a vindictive worthless low-life.
Patrick Farrell said: "[S]orry but you are not "the press" unless the New York Times or someone else has recently hired you."
I am "The Press." I am a card carrying member of the National Writers Union. I have a track report of published articles of public concern. The insinuation that I am not "The Press" is what the US Federal Government did to Glenn Greenwald after he broke the Edward Snowden story. I already wrote on this:
"Even if I said I was purely a journalist, “They” would say I wasn’t a “real” journalist. “They” did the same thing to Glenn Greenwald when he broke the Edward Snowden / NSA Spying story. Now, some call him the Greatest Journalist of All Time."
what an outrage - ! So much abuse, so little justice....(btw, not sure the photo that accompanies the bereaved mother Elena Belogolovsky makes her look very bereaved. Pity one couldn't be found that seemed more bereaved rather than an Eastern European dating website profile photo...)
Typical pattern of abuse-- branding his ex-wife mentally ill with personality disorders that only he "diagnosed" her with. When the press exposes the truth and challenges the narrative, the abusers then shift and target anyone that threatens the false narrative. They've invested time and money to promote the false narrative and anyone that threatens their reality will be their next target. Thank you for your continued fearless investigations and public exposure of DARVO and the abusers manipulation of family court and the court appointed 'experts' who are paid solely by the monied spouse.
Maybe he doesn't feel like his sons death is foder for ambulance chasers? Maybe a Parent who loses a child should not be attacked especially when there is no evidence that they did anything wrong? Maybe have a little compassion and put yourself in that person shoes. I wonder how you would respond in that same situation?9
Ok, Dr. Gitter. Have the balls to respond to the press. Or have one of your "bounty hunter" lawyers return the call and say "no comment." You attack, attack, attack. Why? You've lost the moral high ground by the manner in which you conduct your affairs. What are you hiding?
It takes more courage not to respond to you (sorry but you are not "the press" unless the New York Times or someone else has recently hired you). You bizarrely attack his "male pattern baldness" in the same story where you complain of his ad hominin attack on you which is factual. His baldness is easily correctible. I have read the articles you posted on him and allowed his lunatic ex-wife to attack him pretending to be some sort of victim who could care less about the death of HIS young child and lied repeatedly about the FACTS of the case stated here https://casetext.com/case/belogolovsky-v-gitter. Her behavior is clear proof that she was an uncaring and unfit mother to begin with. Her son tragically dies and all she does is attack the father. That is her only concern. It was easy enough to fact check her, but you didn't do that. Everything she claimed was a lie. But you didn't mention that. You didn't bother to check information that is publicly available. This man, who by all accounts is a very good person, owes nothing to you or that woman, who by her own account is a vindictive worthless low-life.
Patrick Farrell said: "[S]orry but you are not "the press" unless the New York Times or someone else has recently hired you."
I am "The Press." I am a card carrying member of the National Writers Union. I have a track report of published articles of public concern. The insinuation that I am not "The Press" is what the US Federal Government did to Glenn Greenwald after he broke the Edward Snowden story. I already wrote on this:
"Even if I said I was purely a journalist, “They” would say I wasn’t a “real” journalist. “They” did the same thing to Glenn Greenwald when he broke the Edward Snowden / NSA Spying story. Now, some call him the Greatest Journalist of All Time."
https://luthmann.substack.com/p/how-i-respond-to-my-critics
So the real question, Patrick, is who are you? Are you Leonard Gitter or are you just his PAID BITCH?
Oh brother !!