PERJURY ALLGATIONS AGAINST N.Y.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RONALD CASTORNIA, JR.?
PERJURY ALLGATIONS AGAINST N.Y.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RONALD CASTORNIA, JR.?
PLUS: Is Eric Nelson a Corrupt Special Prosecutor?
JUDGE RONALD CASTORINA PERJURY?
SHOCKING NEW ALLEGATIONS about Republican New York State Supreme Court Justice Ronald Castorina, Jr., and perjury.
Will Judge Ron Castorina survive? Phone records show that Castorina operated like a member of LA COSA NOSTRA based on shocking new allegations. You read the facts, and you decide:
CASTORINA LINK: CLICK HERE TO READ THE EXPLOSIVE ALLEGATIONS
Luthmann is equal opportunity. Those public and political figures with issues also include a Democrat NYC Councilwoman and an Independent Newsmax Contributor. Click the links and decide for yourself:
CITY COUNCILWOMAN KAMILLAH HANKS AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE TROUBLE? - READ THE ALLEGATIONS HERE
IS THE SPECIAL SCHMUCK A DIRTY PROSECUTOR?
Richmond County Special District Attorney Eric Nelson appears to be A SPECIAL KIND OF SCHMUCK. The Appointed Special Prosecutor appears to have been cavorting with known felons and disbarred lawyers to prosecute Luthmann and violate his Sixth Amendment Grand Jury rights:
Nelson, as a Special Richmond County District Attorney, has consulted with felons and aided and abetted the unauthorized practice of law - all to tag Luthmann as a felon. This is clearly the Distinct Attorney’s vendetta and vanity case, with the cost to NYC Taxpayers at over $1 million - and the meter is still running.
And the best part is, that the advice Nelson got was totally shitty. Perry Reich is no Perry Mason, and not even F. Lee Bailey. Nelson is a lawyer that has no business leaving the shed next to the Richmond County Family Court where he collects back child support. The only reason that he is Luthmann’s prosecutor is that seasoned Criminal Attorney Tom Tormey Jr. looked at the Luthmann case, saw that there was no criminality, and gave the case back to the Distinct Attorney. Nelson jumped at this case like a fool so he could churn hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and bill the City of New York and its taxpayers. Tom Tormey doesn’t need the money and, more importantly, he didn’t want to get embarrassed. Why? The Grand Jury Clause.
Seasoned Criminal Attorneys know that the Grand Jury Clause imposes certain obligations on prosecutors under the United States and New York State constitutions. Family Court collections attorney Eric Nelson didn’t know much about this area of the law. So who did he consult as an Officer of the Court and a representative of the People of the State of New York? Disbarred Attorney and convicted felon Perry Reich. And Reich gave Nelson terrible legal advice.
Nelson was worried that he would have to disclose to the Grand Jury that the First Amendment imposed limitations on any potential charges against Luthmann. The Special Prosecutor has this unique duty as the Legal Advisor to the Grand Jury. Nelson went to Reich to try to circumvent this obligation. And Nelson probably did so because if Nelson went to a licensed attorney, they would be obligated to report him for Professional Misconduct under Rule 8.3 of the New York State Rules of Professional Conduct.
These two stooges came up with the case of People v. Calbud, Inc. to support the loony assertion that a Special Prosecutor in New York does not have an obligation to advise the Grand Jury of the general application of the First Amendment in relevant Grand Jury presentations. In reality, the New York State Court of Appeals, New York State’s Highest Court said in the more recent case of People v. Huston:
Our State Constitution guarantees that "[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime … unless on indictment of a grand jury" (NY Const, art I, § 6; see also, CPL art 190). By acting as a "buffer between the State and its citizens," the Grand Jury shields against prosecutorial excesses and protects individuals from unfounded prosecutions (People v Calbud, Inc., 49 N.Y.2d 389, 394, 396, 426 N.Y.S.2d 238, 402 N.E.2d 1140; see, People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 108, 476 N.Y.S.2d 79, 464 N.E.2d 447).
The prosecutor's discretion during Grand Jury proceedings is not absolute. As legal advisor to the Grand Jury, the prosecutor performs dual functions: that of public officer and that of advocate. The prosecutor is thus "charged with the duty not only to secure indictments but also to see that justice is done" (People v Lancaster, 69 N.Y.2d at 26; see also, People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d at 105). With this potent authority, moreover, comes responsibility, including "the prosecutor's duty of fair dealing" (People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d at 104).
"These duties and powers, bestowed upon the District Attorney by law, vest that official with substantial control over the Grand Jury proceedings, requiring the exercise of completely impartial judgment and discretion" (People v Di Falco, 44 N.Y.2d at 487).
How is Special Richmond County District Attorney Eric Nelson engaging in “fair dealing” when Nelson is engaging disbarred attorneys and convicted felons in order to violate Luthmann’s Constitutional Rights?
Luthmann’s case is now on appeal in the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division: Second Department in Brooklyn, New York. The Brooklyn Appellate Court has said in People v Samuels:
The District Attorney is required to instruct the grand jury on the law with respect to matters before it (see CPL 190.25 [6]). If the District Attorney fails to instruct the grand jury on a defense that would eliminate a needless or unfounded prosecution, the proceeding is defective, mandating dismissal of the indictment (see CPL 210.35 [5]; People v Valles, 62 N.Y.2d 36, 38, 464 N.E.2d 418, 476 N.Y.S.2d 50 [1984]; People v Calbud, Inc., 49 N.Y.2d 389, 395-396, 402 N.E.2d 1140, 426 N.Y.S.2d 238 [1980]). (People v Samuels, 12 AD3d 695, 698 [2d Dept 2004])
Nelson discussed how to get around the case of People v. Perkins with Reich, his shady co-conspirator and “legal advisor.” In that case, a Brooklyn Appellate Court said:
Any proscription of pure speech must be sharply limited to words which, by their utterance alone, inflict injury or tend naturally to evoke immediate violence or other breach of the peace. (People v Perkins, 150 Misc 2d 543, 543 [App Term 1991])
Nelson’s own witness list before the Grand Jury shows that Luthmann was involved in First Amendment-protected political speech, or at least the Grand Jury should have been advised of that distinct possibility and the general legal ramifications:
Michael Ryan, Commissioner of the New York City Board of Elections, Former Democrat Party Candidate for Richmond County District Attorney, Attorney at Law, and Democrat Party Operative.
Joseph Borelli, New York City Council Minority Leader (Republican Party), Republican Party Operative, and RINO.
Ronald Castorina, Jr., New York State Supreme Court Justice (Republican Party), Former New York State Assemblyman, Attorney at Law, Republican Party Operative, and RINO.
Ashleigh Owens, Chief of Staff of the Richmond County District Attorney’s Officer, Attorney at Law, Former Staffer for Democrat Senator James Webb, and Democrat Party Operative.
Michael McMahon, District Attorney for Richmond County, New York, Former Congressman for the Democrat Party loyal to Nancy Pelosi, Former New York City Councilman, Attorney at Law, and Democrat Party Operative.
John Gulino, Staten Island Democrat Party Leader Emeritus, Attorney at Law, Democrat Party Operative, and Mob Lawyer in Steven Segal movies.
Debi Rose, an effective New York City Councilwoman for Staten Island’s North Shore for over a decade, longtime community activist and leader.
Stuart Brenker, longtime Staten Island Democrat Party Operative and tanning aficionado.
Janine Materna, failed New York State Assembly Candidate, failed New York City Council Candidate, Former Democrat Party Member, total loser (I think the work is #BITTER), “bat-shit crazy” political disruptor, Attorney at Law, and RINO.
If that witness list doesn’t make Luthmann’s social media conduct PROTECTED POLITICAL SPEECH, then bring in the Stasi because we’re in East Germany circa 1968. The indictment against Luthmann is literally “TRUMPED-UP” because the charges of Falsification of Business Records are the same charges that lousy, corrupt, and partisan New York State prosecutors have been trying to hit Donald Trump with for years. For Luthmann, this is a badge of honor. For New York City Taxpayers, this is a black eye.
But the best part is that since all of these people have given sworn testimony (many of them attorneys), Luthmann now has a shot at a “perjury trap” on each and every one of them when Luthmann’s case goes back to trial.
Luthmann has a feeling that yet another SHAME ON YOU moment is coming for the Government, the Special Schmuck, and the Distinct Attorney. But before that, Luthmann believes that the Court will have no choice but to relieve Eric Nelson as Special Prosecutor because of his serious misconduct. The larger question is: How deep does this corruption go?
WHAT’S NEXT?
Is there more? Of course, there is more. Luthmann is armed with many weapons in the Great Troll War.
But there will be many more Enemies to come. What new Enemies will show their faces in the Feudal Court and elsewhere? Which members of the Tyrannical Ruling Elite should be worried? What other persons may become collateral damage in this story? And what magical weapons does Luthmann have to slay his Enemies?
Stay tuned. Much more to come.
We welcome any and all comments.