Fathers go through the same thing too. With the DV industry admitting that 73% of allegations are false and the Feds number is around 90%, why is it that this article does not recognize that more mother's get custody of their children than father's because they can get away with false allegations that allow them to brainwash the children to falsely hate their other parent. And this also happens to mothers. this is a genderless issues. And anyone who claims it only happens to mother's is turning a blind eye to the truth. I have countless stories of father's falsely accused but by the time they prove that the allegations are false, the children have been programmed with false memories to believe that. their father's are no good. Or worse, they get kidnapped to another country where there is no extradition. This is NOT OKAY. Stop blaming fathers. It is the adversarial process that the attorneys create in the courts. I have case after case after case of fathers who are great dads and have been from day number 1, but their ex's decide they want to control everything including whether their children have a relationship with the other parent. In fact, in 99% of all of my cases, no matter the gender, the parent making the false claims was 1) Alienated from one of their parents, 2) a victim of abuse themselves and no one saved them so they project their issues through the children on to the to her parent in an attempt to save little them.
Joan - Is the entire move to legally justify "coercive control" and de-legitimatize parental alienation driven by the federal funding available under the Violence Against Women Act only if the law characterizes activity in certain way? I've heard many activists and experts say that, and I'd love to get your take.
I sent you an email with evidence that Lee has ignored. And coercive control laws are already being abused by both genders in CT. VAWA is a joke. It does NOT include fathers or men. In fact, if they truly were genderless in their act, they would change the name to Violence Against Humans Act. And yes, the funding to VAWA is so extensive that they can bring forward a plethora of misinformation that is not even verifiable or their research replicable. I will send you the scientific work of true experts who have proven the Meyers and Mercers work is fraudulent and that their funding should have been retracted by Georgetown University and the Feds.
Thank you Joan. I will review everything. I think the thrust of Bandy Lee's point and something that has broad consensus is that Family Courts are an "Abuse Industry." An adversarial process is one thing. But in Family Court all across America, the so-called "professionals" are rewarded for enhancing acrimony and not solving problems.
How do we fix this?
What do you think about proposals to have a jury in a Family Court trial?
dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com
You cannot reform corruption. Family court must be abolished. Slam the Gavel podcast
Fathers go through the same thing too. With the DV industry admitting that 73% of allegations are false and the Feds number is around 90%, why is it that this article does not recognize that more mother's get custody of their children than father's because they can get away with false allegations that allow them to brainwash the children to falsely hate their other parent. And this also happens to mothers. this is a genderless issues. And anyone who claims it only happens to mother's is turning a blind eye to the truth. I have countless stories of father's falsely accused but by the time they prove that the allegations are false, the children have been programmed with false memories to believe that. their father's are no good. Or worse, they get kidnapped to another country where there is no extradition. This is NOT OKAY. Stop blaming fathers. It is the adversarial process that the attorneys create in the courts. I have case after case after case of fathers who are great dads and have been from day number 1, but their ex's decide they want to control everything including whether their children have a relationship with the other parent. In fact, in 99% of all of my cases, no matter the gender, the parent making the false claims was 1) Alienated from one of their parents, 2) a victim of abuse themselves and no one saved them so they project their issues through the children on to the to her parent in an attempt to save little them.
Joan - Is the entire move to legally justify "coercive control" and de-legitimatize parental alienation driven by the federal funding available under the Violence Against Women Act only if the law characterizes activity in certain way? I've heard many activists and experts say that, and I'd love to get your take.
I sent you an email with evidence that Lee has ignored. And coercive control laws are already being abused by both genders in CT. VAWA is a joke. It does NOT include fathers or men. In fact, if they truly were genderless in their act, they would change the name to Violence Against Humans Act. And yes, the funding to VAWA is so extensive that they can bring forward a plethora of misinformation that is not even verifiable or their research replicable. I will send you the scientific work of true experts who have proven the Meyers and Mercers work is fraudulent and that their funding should have been retracted by Georgetown University and the Feds.
Thank you Joan. I will review everything. I think the thrust of Bandy Lee's point and something that has broad consensus is that Family Courts are an "Abuse Industry." An adversarial process is one thing. But in Family Court all across America, the so-called "professionals" are rewarded for enhancing acrimony and not solving problems.
How do we fix this?
What do you think about proposals to have a jury in a Family Court trial?
Abolish family court. You can’t reform corruption. Take it back to civil court where a parent can have a jury…..