By Richard Luthmann
SCOTUS Doxxer Danesh Noshirvan, a self-proclaimed social media accountability crusader, has created a dangerous playbook that manipulates truth, destroys reputations, and, in the case of Aaron De La Torre, may have contributed to a tragic death.
Noshirvan’s methods rely on artificial intelligence, sock puppet accounts, and a brazen disregard for the truth, all under the guise of “holding people accountable.”
The fallout of his reckless campaigns has left a trail of emotional and social destruction. Texas authorities are now investigating him for criminally negligent homicide after the suicide of De La Torre, a beloved coach and mentor.
Noshirvan’s campaign against De La Torre began with accusations lacking substantiation. By leveraging AI tools and fake social media accounts, he amplified baseless claims, including allegations of child abuse and a violent past.
According to Denton Independent School District and police reports, the investigation into an alleged assault by De La Torre found “no probable cause” and “no evidence” to substantiate criminal activity.
Yet, Noshirvan’s lies persisted, creating a tsunami of public outrage and harassment that engulfed De La Torre’s life.
Sock Puppets and Manufactured Chaos
Noshirvan’s methods are as deceptive as they are damaging. He has openly admitted using sock puppet accounts to create fake personas for his campaigns.
These accounts fabricate public outrage, making it appear that communities are united in condemning his targets.
“I made a fake conservative account and started messing with you,” he bragged in one video.
This tactic was pivotal in amplifying the false allegations against De La Torre. Witnesses, including parents and police, found no merit to the accusations, yet Noshirvan continued to bombard social media with lies.
The resulting harassment overwhelmed De La Torre and local authorities, wasting resources that could have been allocated to genuine public safety concerns.
A Tragic Outcome in Texas
The harassment campaign reached its devastating climax when De La Torre took his own life. Friends and colleagues described him as a dedicated educator who had positively impacted countless young lives.
The relentless pressure of baseless accusations and public vilification left him emotionally drained. His death has now sparked a criminal investigation into Noshirvan’s role.
Under Texas law, criminally negligent homicide applies when someone’s actions demonstrate a gross deviation from reasonable care, leading to another’s death. Prosecutors are examining whether Noshirvan’s campaigns meet this threshold.
In addition to potential criminal charges for negligent homicide, Noshirvan’s actions could constitute violations of Texas Penal Code § 37.08, which criminalizes false reporting to law enforcement. The law specifically targets individuals who knowingly make false statements to deceive authorities.
Noshirvan’s AI-driven campaigns often inundate officials with exaggerated and fabricated complaints, consuming critical resources.
Fraudulent Narratives and Reckless Malice
At the core of Noshirvan’s tactics lies deliberate malice. He repeatedly spread misinformation about De La Torre’s past, falsely portraying him as a violent offender. Police records and school district reports, however, revealed only a decades-old misdemeanor from De La Torre’s college years.
Despite evidence disproving his allegations, Noshirvan persisted, causing irreparable harm to De La Torre’s reputation and mental health.
Noshirvan’s broader use of AI and sock puppets exacerbates the harm. By creating an illusion of widespread public outcry, he pressures institutions to act on false premises. This manipulation harms individuals and erodes public trust in legitimate accountability efforts.
The AI-driven harassment overwhelmed local law enforcement and even prompted unnecessary administrative actions in De La Torre’s school district, further amplifying the chaos.
Danesh Noshirvan spread lies about Aaron De La Torre, amplified through social media and AI-driven campaigns. They not only destroyed Aaron’s reputation but also led to overwhelming emotional distress that played a role in his tragic death. The indictment against Danesh in the public square is overwhelming:
Allegation of Child Abuse
Danesh falsely accused Aaron of physically assaulting a 12-year-old child, including choking and beating the child. Police and witness accounts found no evidence to support these allegations.Claiming a Violent Past
Danesh spread rumors that Aaron had a history of violence, suggesting he was a dangerous individual. In reality, the only legal issue in Aaron’s past was a decades-old minor misdemeanor from his college years, which had no bearing on his role as an educator.Fabricated Public Outrage
Using sock puppet accounts, Danesh manufactured fake support for these baseless accusations, creating the illusion of widespread condemnation of Aaron.Misrepresentation of Police Investigations
Danesh claimed that police were negligent or complicit in not taking action against Aaron despite reports clearly stating that there was no probable cause or evidence of criminal behavior.False Reporting to Authorities
Danesh reportedly filed and caused his followers to file exaggerated and misleading complaints with local law enforcement and school officials, pressuring them to take unnecessary actions against Aaron.Portrayal of Aaron as a Threat to Students
Danesh insinuated that Aaron was unfit to be around students, tarnishing his reputation as a trusted educator and mentor without any factual basis.Claiming Institutional Failures
Danesh alleged that Aaron’s employer, the Denton Independent School District, was covering up his alleged misconduct, casting unwarranted aspersions on the district and its leadership.Depicting Aaron as Unrepentant
Danesh painted Aaron as unapologetic for his alleged behavior, further vilifying him in the public’s eyes despite his spotless reputation as a coach and role model.
The Demand for Justice: A Reckoning for Cancel Culture’s Dark Side
As the investigation unfolds, Noshirvan’s conduct raises urgent questions about the ethics and legality of modern “cancel culture.” His campaigns showcase a reckless disregard for the truth and an alarming willingness to weaponize technology for personal vendettas, attacking civilians without remorse.
The Denton community’s grief over De La Torre’s death underscores the real-world consequences of Noshirvan’s actions.
Holding Noshirvan accountable is about more than justice for De La Torre; it is about setting a precedent to prevent similar tragedies. His actions have highlighted the need for stricter regulations on AI-driven harassment and stronger protections for individuals targeted by online mobs.
Public safety demands that we draw a line between legitimate accountability and the reckless endangerment of lives.
Dr. Phil’s interviews with Noshirvan highlight that he was fully aware of the potential harm his actions could cause. Noshirvan acknowledged the possibility that his campaigns could lead to mental distress or even loss of life.
Despite this, he continued to spread falsehoods, escalate harassment, and manipulate public sentiment. This awareness, coupled with his deliberate fraud, dishonesty, and disregard for the truth, makes him legally responsible for Aaron De La Torre’s death.
His conduct exemplifies a gross deviation from the standard of care expected, and his actions align with the definition of criminally negligent homicide under Texas law.
The death of Aaron De La Torre stands as a stark reminder of the destructive power of lies and digital mob justice. Danesh Noshirvan’s actions exemplify the worst aspects of cancel culture, where truth is expendable, and human lives become collateral damage.
As authorities in Texas authorities get against him, the case serves as a clarion call to confront the ethical and legal failings that allow such behavior to persist. Justice for De La Torre is about accountability and reclaiming a culture of integrity and compassion.
Share this post