NOTE: This piece first appeared on FLGulfNews.com.
By Rick LaRivière with Richard Luthmann
Richard Luthmann, the #Uncancellable journalist and former Game of Thrones Lawyer, says enough is enough.
An investigative reporter with a history of exposing corruption, Luthmann says he’s done playing nice.
After being targeted by WOKE lawfare and spending years in federal prison, he’s back and ready to tear down YouTube’s ‘Community Standards’—which he calls “treasonous and foreign-directed viewpoint censorship.”
He was effectively “deplatformed” from YouTube after a “WOKE mob hit-job” by Mega Influencers Danesh Noshirvan and Jeremy Hales.
He’s taking direct aim at YouTube CEO Neal Mohan, calling him the digital gatekeeper and personally responsible for crushing free speech.
Luthmann says he will doxx Mohan in this live broadcast—because, in his words, “If they want to silence me, they’ll have to do it on the record. Neal Mohan is knowingly aiding and abetting the enemies of America, foreign and domestic.”
Drawing from his firsthand battles and landmark cases, Luthmann will reveal the legal arguments behind his crusade against Big Tech’s mob rule. He’s not just fighting for himself—he’s fighting for every voice that’s been canceled.
Join Richard Luthmann tonight at 9:00 PM ET on Rumble. Because what is dead may never die—and the WAR ON THE WOKE is just starting.
Luthmann Unleashes War: “Community Standards” is Viewpoint Censorship Enforced By YouTube, Its CEO Neal Mohan, and WOKE Cancel Culture’s Digital Factions
Luthmann claims YouTube’s “Community Standards” are nothing more than a digital club used to beat down dissenters, a cudgel wielded by WOKE influencers like Danesh Noshirvan and Jeremy Hales.
“These ‘Community Standards’ aren’t neutral,” Luthmann says. “They’re a viewpoint-discrimination machine aimed at enhancing mega-factionalism.”
His argument is clear: YouTube’s platform, wielding immense power over speech, has become a modern Mega-Influencer over the means of political participation.
“When YouTube enforces AI-driven, non-content-neutral censorship,” he says, “they are responsible for the march to the next American Civil War, by turbocharging factionalism.”
He points to the Moody v. NetChoice SCOTUS decision. The government cannot justify interfering with a private speaker’s editorial choices merely by claiming an interest in improving or balancing the marketplace of ideas. Luthmann says the issue here is no more of a “passive choice” than was Benedict Arnold’s “passive choice” to hand over West Point to the British Army.
Luthmann says YouTube, Mohan, and Big Tech’s actions “smack of treason” because they are knowingly organizing the enemies of American liberty, foreign and domestic.
“YouTube is a faction aggregator, and is consistently choosing against America,” Luthmann argues. “They’re not a private actor where laissez-faire should apply. Big Tech Elites are no different from antebellum Southern Plantation owners. In my opinion, their actions are leading Americans down the path to globalist slavery. Their connections to George Soros, the Chinese Communist Party, Scott Dworkin, and others sure look like aid and comfort to the enemies of America.”
Luthmann Unleashes War: The Mob and Madison’s Warning
Luthmann says his War is about more than just him. He draws on the wisdom of the Founding Fathers.
“James Madison warned us in Federalist 10,” he says, referencing the essay written in 1787.
“Madison described the danger of factions—groups who unite around passion or interest and crush the rights of the minority. That’s exactly what’s happening today with WOKE Mega Influencers like Danesh, Hales, and their followers, turbocharged by YouTube, Mohan, and their choices.”
According to Luthmann, YouTube’s algorithm amplifies these WOKE factions, giving the biggest mob the biggest megaphone.
“They are letting these WOKE digital lynch mobs decide who gets to speak,” he says. “It’s not about safety or misinformation—that’s a bullshit pretext. It’s about raw power, plain and simple.”
Madison, he points out, argued that liberty is the air that fuels faction. But liberty is also the cure for faction’s worst abuses.
“YouTube forgot that part,” he says. “They’re stifling liberty under the pretext of ‘stability.’ And activist federal judges forget that, too, when they look at the legislative history of Section 230. The only important legislative history here is the one produced in Independence Hall in Philadelphia over 200 years ago.”
Luthmann Unleashes War: Neal Mohan in the Crosshairs
Neal Mohan, YouTube’s CEO, is in Luthmann’s sights.
“Mohan can’t hide behind YouTube,” he says. “He’s the final decision-maker. He signs off on this digital censorship.”
Luthmann says Mohan isn’t just a passive actor.
“He’s the gatekeeper of the public square. That makes him personally responsible for the viewpoint discrimination. And if he’s beholden to Beijing, Soros, and others, as I believe is clear from the record, then he and many others should hang.”
Luthmann plans to sue Mohan personally, accusing him of acting like a digital dictator.
“I want Mohan to stand up in a federal courtroom and explain why he thinks it’s okay to crush journalists, free speech, and natural law,” Luthmann says. “We will obliterate Section 230 immunity with the letter and spirit of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We will force him to answer why he’s spent his career destroying American Society and Liberty.”
Mohan’s personal addresses and phone numbers have already been compiled in Luthmann’s back-and-forth with YouTube.
“I’m not afraid to show my back and forth with YouTube. These executives are public figures,” Luthmann says. “They want to be public influencers? Fine. They are the ultimate ‘Mega Influencers.’ That comes with accountability.”
Luthmann Unleashes War: Doxxing as a Constitutional Right?
Critics might say Luthmann’s tactics go too far. He’s not shy about the “license to doxx” argument.
“Look,” he says. “The federal courts in the MDFL have recognized that doxxing is legal. They haven’t stopped Danesh Noshirvan, who doxxed six Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, causing Justice Kavanaugh and his family to almost get murdered. It’s the price of public debate. And it applies to both sides until one of the branches of government says differently.”
Luthmann says he’s ready to expose the real lives of the Big Tech executives the same way Danesh Noshirvan exposed the lives and families of six Supreme Court justices.
“If they want to silence me, like Danesh and Hales have used their platform and AI, then it’s fair game for them, too,” he says. “It’s not revenge. It’s fair play and substantial justice because the federal courts have condoned the practice when applied against the great public servants on the high court.”
Luthmann argues that litigation privilege covers this kind of exposure.
“If I’m going to court, I can speak freely about the parties involved,” he says. “The law is clear on that. If Mohan wants to call me a ‘liar’ or a ‘danger to him and his snowflakes’ in court, he can—but he will have to do it on the record. Speech gets dangerous, and these educated elite idiots forgot the fundamental wisdom of our founding generation.”
Luthmann Unleashes War: The Legal Foundation for the Fight
Luthmann insists this isn’t just a publicity stunt. He’s marshaling real legal precedent.
He cites Marsh v. Alabama (1946), in which the Supreme Court held that private property opened to public speech can’t be censored like a tyrant.
He also points to Manhattan Community Access v. Halleck (2019), where the Court recognized that some private entities act like government agents when they run public spaces.
“YouTube is today’s digital company town,” Luthmann says. “Mohan is the mayor.”
He also relies on Brentwood Academy v. TSSAA (2001), where private groups entwined with government policies can be sued as state actors.
“YouTube acts like treasonous digital shock troops,” Luthmann says. “They do the deep state, the Chinese Communist Party, and George Soros’ dirty work by silencing dissent in favor of their ‘favored’ factions.”
He claims YouTube’s biased algorithms and Community Standards are nothing more than a faction’s tool to crush “undesirable,” “constitutional,” and “natural law originalist” viewpoints.
“If they had succeeded on November 5, we’d already be either in open revolution or already in WWIII, where the aftermath would be globalist slavery.”
Luthmann Unleashes War: A Journalistic Mission, A Personal Crusade
Luthmann frames his battle as a fight for investigative journalism.
“I’m not just fighting for me,” he says. “I’m fighting for every journalist who’s been muzzled by these WOKE censors.”
He argues that the Supreme Court’s Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001) ruling protects journalists who report on matters of public concern, even if they offend powerful people.
“The First Amendment doesn’t have a popularity clause,” he says. “It protects me when I expose what the WOKE mobs don’t want to hear, and they have a fleeting relationship with the TRUTH.”
Luthmann says he’s not alone.
“Danesh Noshirvan and Jeremy Hales want to shut down everyone who questions them,” he says. “There’s a reason the First Amendment was written first. It’s there to protect the unpopular voices. However, YouTube’s sinister system prioritizes these “favored viewpoints” and the “ability of these factions to destroy all counterpoint.”
Luthmann says his journalism is putting WOKE Mega Influencers at risk, including Noshirvan, who has failed to answer questions about the production of commercial pornography potentially involving minors and the failure to file 18 U.S.C. § 2257 consents, a federal crime. Hales is Noshirvan‘s new media “partner,” spreading more disinformation.
Luthmann Unleashes War: Preparing for “Unholy Hell”
Luthmann says he’s ready to unleash “unholy hell consonant with natural law.”
His language is blunt and unapologetic.
“God gave me these rights,” he says. “And I will go to the Gates of Hell before a WOKE Mega Influencer – and that is what YouTube is – can take them away.”
He’s planning a federal lawsuit in the Middle District of Florida that will name YouTube, LLC, Mohan personally, and potentially others.
His goal?
“To raise the social cost of treason,” he says. “To expose the corruption of Big Tech, the digital mobs, and their enablers.”
He says the lawsuit will highlight how factions—like those Madison warned about—are aided by enemies foreign and domestic.
“China, Russia, Soros—they’re laughing while YouTube crushes Americans’ voices defending free speech, a free press, and the marketplace of ideas,” Luthmann says. “If you don’t see this as subversion, you’re part of the problem.”
Luthmann Unleashes War: What’s Next for the Digital Frontline?
Luthmann’s War on YouTube is about more than algorithms. It’s about power, he says—the power to shape discourse, to decide who gets to speak and who gets shut down.
“I’m not going to let these WOKE mobsters dictate America’s story, and that is what Big Tech executives are today. They are the new national criminal organization or ‘Commission,’ ” he says. “I’m going to court. I’m going to the media. I’m going to every digital battlefield they throw at me.”
He’s not afraid of the pushback.
“They can call me every name in the book,” he says. “But they won’t silence me. This is America. The fight has just begun.”
He quoted Jefferson, explaining that sacrifices are necessary to maintain American freedom:
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”
Share this post