By Richard Luthmann
Paul Boyne, the controversial blogger behind The Family Court Circus, is days away from potential release after spending 18 months in Connecticut custody. Friends and supporters have reportedly raised his bail, which is set at $5,250. Boyne is eager to leave the New Haven jail, where he has spent months awaiting trial on charges of cyberstalking judges.
However, the saga is far from over. State’s Attorney Jack Doyle is expected to argue for restrictive bail conditions in an upcoming hearing.
A Virginia resident, Boyne gained notoriety for his incendiary posts targeting the Connecticut family court system. Critics accuse him of issuing threats, citing phrases like “Judge Moukawsher in the crosshair sight of a firearm” and “worthy of a .50 cal to the head.”
Boyne insists his posts are satire protected by the First Amendment, citing precedent from cases like Watts v. United States.
“If you can joke about a .50 cal and Obama, why not judges?” Boyne told journalist Richard Luthmann in a recent jailhouse interview.
Boyne’s Take on Jack Doyle and the Connecticut Courts
Boyne does not mince words when discussing New Haven prosecutor Jack Doyle, who he alleges is pursuing a politically motivated vendetta.
“Jack Doyle isn’t seeking justice; he’s protecting corrupt judges,” Boyne said.
He believes Doyle’s opposition to his release is part of a broader strategy to keep him jailed until he agrees to a plea deal.
“Doyle knows this case is flimsy. Connecticut courts are on thin ice legally,” Boyne said, citing constitutional issues with the stalking statute he’s charged under.
“It’s a blatant violation of the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Doyle’s going to eat crow when this gets tossed.”
Boyne also questioned Doyle’s ethics.
“He’s arguing for ankle monitors and impossible conditions to keep me locked up,” he said. “Doyle’s career will end in disbarment once this misconduct is exposed.”
Joette Katz and Goodwin Procter LLP: Alleged Puppeteers
Boyne is equally scathing in his critique of Joette Katz, a former Connecticut Supreme Court Justice and current partner at Goodwin Procter LLP.
“Joette Katz has been pulling strings to weaponize the judiciary against me,” he claimed.
Boyne referenced an email in the court record allegedly instructing others to “KATZ SPEAK TO ONLY,” which he believes shows her improper influence.
“Katz and her firm promote an agenda that undermines public confidence in the judiciary,” Boyne said.
He accuses her of violating professional conduct rules and using her influence to silence him.
“She represents everything wrong with the Connecticut courts—collusion, corruption, and suppression of dissent.”
Boyne’s former legal team reportedly avoided addressing Katz’s involvement in court filings, a point of contention for the outspoken defendant.
“Every time I mentioned Katz, my attorney looked like they’d seen a ghost,” he said.
The Media’s Role: Boyne Blasts Ed Mahony
Boyne directed his ire at Hartford Courant reporter Ed Mahony, whose recent article blamed delays in Boyne’s case on the defendant.
“Mahony is a mouthpiece for the state,” Boyne alleged.
He claims Mahony has consistently misrepresented facts, including reporting on an altercation in jail that Boyne says was inaccurately portrayed.
“He’s just parroting what the judges say,” Boyne said. “His articles twist the truth to fit their narrative. He called me ‘consumed’ by my divorce, but he never explained what the courts did to me and my kids.”
Boyne believes Mahony’s coverage is part of a coordinated effort to discredit him.
“Mahony knows exactly what he’s doing—running interference for a corrupt system,” he said.
Boyne even suggested that Mahony has insider access to sealed documents, further fueling his distrust.
Boyne’s Plans After Release
If released, Boyne plans to fight back on all fronts.
“First, I’m having a bourbon,” he joked.
But after celebrating his release, he intends to focus on his legal battle. Boyne is determined to challenge the constitutionality of Connecticut’s stalking statute, citing a similar law struck down in Illinois.
“I’ll prove this case is a sham,” Boyne said. “Connecticut doesn’t have jurisdiction over me. Their entire argument falls apart under scrutiny.”
Boyne is also eager to reclaim his seized computers, which he says contain critical evidence for his defense.
“I can dismantle their case in an afternoon with my data,” he said. “The state police are holding my property because they know I’ll use it to expose them.”
Boyne even floated the idea of moving to Illinois to exploit its precedent against similar statutes.
“Maybe I’ll establish residency there and send Doyle a note: ‘Game over,’” he said with a laugh.
The Road Ahead
Boyne’s upcoming bail hearing will determine his immediate future. While he prepares for potential release, Doyle is expected to push for strict conditions, including house arrest and electronic monitoring.
“They want to keep me under their thumb even after I post bail,” Boyne said. “But once I’m out, I’ll have the resources to fight back.”
Boyne’s case raises broader questions about free speech and judicial accountability. Critics argue his prosecution sets a dangerous precedent for criminalizing dissent.
“This isn’t about safety; it’s about silencing criticism,” Boyne said.
For now, Boyne waits, hopeful that his release will mark the beginning of a more aggressive defense.
“Connecticut courts aren’t just corrupt—they’re incompetent,” he said. “And I’m going to prove it.”
As Boyne prepares to leave jail, his fight against Connecticut’s judiciary is far from over. Whether seen as a free speech martyr or an agitator who crossed the line, his case continues to ignite debate over the limits of dissent and the power of the state.
Share this post